Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RFGvsMDYGETF Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) and SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Growth ETF (MDYG) belong to the same industry segment: US Mid Cap Growth. RFG's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Information Technology. In contrast, MDYG's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. RFG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.15% for MDYG. RFG is up 4.77% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. MDYG performs worse with 3.35% YTD performance, and -$54M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RFG and MDYG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RFG vs MDYG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RFG MDYG | -1.84%-3.03% | +4.01%+2.29% | +4.77%+3.35% | +25.39%+21.18% | +59.87%+50.57% | +28.98%+32.53% |
| Flows | RFG MDYG | -$10K+$5M | -$936K-$49M | +$2M-$54M | -$41M-$446M | -$53M+$79M | -$138M+$241M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RFG MDYG | +19.61%+17.77% | +22.90%+22.04% | +19.74%+18.47% | +22.66%+20.50% |
| Max drawdown | RFG MDYG | -6.88%-7.29% | -14.87%-15.01% | -26.58%-25.46% | -35.14%-29.25% |
| Max drawdown duration | RFG MDYG | 10d10d | 44d46d | 380d379d | 836d834d |
RFG | MDYG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $54.75 | $95.31 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $54.97 | $95.52 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RFG | MDYG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RFG | MDYG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $54.75 | $95.31 |
| 1D performance | -0.40% | -0.22% |
| AuM | $303.76 M | $2.47 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.15% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RFG and MDYG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, RFG is up 4.77% year-to-date (YTD), while MDYG has returned 3.35%. That puts RFG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RFG or MDYG?
Year-to-date, the RFG ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to -$54M for MDYG.
Which ETF is more volatile: RFG or MDYG?
Over the past year, RFG had a volatility of 22.9%, while MDYG experienced 22.04%.
Which ETF is bigger: RFG or MDYG?
As of March 12, 2026, RFG holds $303.76 M in assets under management (AUM), while MDYG manages $2.47 B.
What sectors do the RFG and MDYG ETFs invest in?
RFG leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Information Technology. Meanwhile, MDYG focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the RFG ETF and MDYG ETF?
RFG top holdings include HECLA MINING, MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC and AEROVIRONMENT. MDYG holds in its top three: CIENA, US19247G1076 and LUMENTUM HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: RFG or MDYG?
RFG holds 91 securities with 29.38% of its assets in the top 15. MDYG has 240 securities and a top 15 weight of 20.17%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
