Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RFGvsIJKETF Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) and iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) belong to the same industry segment: US Mid Cap Growth. RFG's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Information Technology. In contrast, IJK's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. RFG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.17% for IJK. RFG is up 4.77% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. IJK performs worse with 3.34% YTD performance, and -$103M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RFG and IJK below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RFG vs IJK performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RFG IJK | -1.84%-3.04% | +4.01%+2.29% | +4.77%+3.34% | +25.39%+21.18% | +59.87%+50.56% | +28.98%+32.48% |
| Flows | RFG IJK | -$10K+$31M | -$936K-$115M | +$2M-$103M | -$41M-$748M | -$53M-$819M | -$138M-$923M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RFG IJK | +19.61%+18.17% | +22.90%+22.15% | +19.74%+18.51% | +22.66%+20.53% |
| Max drawdown | RFG IJK | -6.88%-7.29% | -14.87%-15.02% | -26.58%-25.48% | -35.14%-29.27% |
| Max drawdown duration | RFG IJK | 10d10d | 44d46d | 380d379d | 836d834d |
RFG | IJK | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $54.75 | $99.95 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $54.97 | $100.14 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RFG | IJK | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RFG | IJK | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $54.75 | $99.95 |
| 1D performance | -0.40% | -0.19% |
| AuM | $303.76 M | $9.33 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.17% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RFG and IJK ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, RFG is up 4.77% year-to-date (YTD), while IJK has returned 3.34%. That puts RFG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RFG or IJK?
Year-to-date, the RFG ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to -$103M for IJK.
Which ETF is more volatile: RFG or IJK?
Over the past year, RFG had a volatility of 22.9%, while IJK experienced 22.15%.
Which ETF is bigger: RFG or IJK?
As of March 12, 2026, RFG holds $303.76 M in assets under management (AUM), while IJK manages $9.33 B.
What sectors do the RFG and IJK ETFs invest in?
RFG leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Information Technology. Meanwhile, IJK focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the RFG ETF and IJK ETF?
RFG top holdings include HECLA MINING, MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC and AEROVIRONMENT. IJK holds in its top three: CIENA, US19247G1076 and LUMENTUM HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: RFG or IJK?
RFG holds 91 securities with 29.38% of its assets in the top 15. IJK has 238 securities and a top 15 weight of 20.49%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
