Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RFGvsFSGSETF Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) belongs to the US Mid Cap Growth segment. First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. RFG's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Information Technology. In contrast, FSGS's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. RFG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.61% for FSGS. RFG is up 4.39% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. FSGS performs worse with -3.85% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RFG and FSGS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RFG vs FSGS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RFG FSGS | -3.92%-2.75% | +3.85%-5.80% | +4.39%-3.85% | +27.59%+8.38% | +59.30%+19.37% | +26.40%+7.54% |
| Flows | RFG FSGS | +$549K- | -$936K-$1M | +$2M+$2M | -$41M-$2M | -$53M-$3M | -$138M+$17M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RFG FSGS | +19.62%+14.89% | +22.80%+19.81% | +19.73%+19.28% | +22.64%+20.34% |
| Max drawdown | RFG FSGS | -7.22%-8.79% | -14.87%-12.54% | -26.58%-23.71% | -35.14%-23.71% |
| Max drawdown duration | RFG FSGS | 11d49d | 44d38d | 380d472d | 836d472d |
RFG | FSGS | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $54.75 | $29.30 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $54.97 | $29.24 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RFG | FSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RFG | FSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $54.75 | $29.30 |
| 1D performance | -0.40% | +0.19% |
| AuM | $302.68 M | $27.80 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.61% |
RFG | FSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | First Trust |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index | The SMID Growth Strength Index |
| N° of holdings | 87 | 99 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 1, 2006 | June 20, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RFG and FSGS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, RFG is up 4.39% year-to-date (YTD), while FSGS has lost -3.85%. That puts RFG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RFG or FSGS?
Year-to-date, the RFG ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$2M for FSGS.
Which ETF is more volatile: RFG or FSGS?
Over the past year, RFG had a volatility of 22.8%, while FSGS experienced 19.81%.
Which ETF is bigger: RFG or FSGS?
As of March 13, 2026, RFG holds $302.68 M in assets under management (AUM), while FSGS manages $27.80 M.
What sectors do the RFG and FSGS ETFs invest in?
RFG leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Information Technology. Meanwhile, FSGS focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the RFG ETF and FSGS ETF?
RFG top holdings include HECLA MINING, MEDPACE HOLDINGS INC and AEROVIRONMENT. FSGS holds in its top three: STRIDE INC, DECKERS OUTDOOR and CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS.
Which ETF is more diversified: RFG or FSGS?
RFG holds 91 securities with 29.38% of its assets in the top 15. FSGS has 99 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.56%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
