RFGvsCSMDETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) belongs to the US Mid Cap Growth segment. Congress SMid Growth ETF (CSMD) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. RFG's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Healthcare. In contrast, CSMD's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. RFG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.68% for CSMD. RFG is up 11% year-to-date (YTD) with +$11M in YTD flows. CSMD performs worse with 4.29% YTD performance, and +$20M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RFG and CSMD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RFG vs CSMD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RFG CSMD | -8.55%-7.91% | -0.48%+4.23% | +11.00%+4.29% | +13.78%+1.57% | +44.42%n/a | +32.37%n/a |
| Flows | RFG CSMD | +$2M+$2M | +$4M+$2M | +$11M+$20M | -$11M+$100M | -$31M- | -$118M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RFG CSMD | +22.24%+22.30% | +19.65%+20.35% | +20.46%n/a | +22.90%n/a |
| Max drawdown | RFG CSMD | -9.92%-9.67% | -10.42%-14.80% | -26.58%n/a | -35.14%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RFG CSMD | 37d29d | 45d130d | 380dn/a | 836dn/a |
Trading data
RFG | CSMD | |
Last sale 7/30/2026 at 4:28 PM | $59.21 | $33.38 |
| Previous close 07/29/2026 | $58.15 | $32.97 |
| Consolidated volume 07/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CSMD
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexRFG | CSMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/30/2026 at 4:28 PM
Live
Closed
RFG | CSMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $59.21 | $33.38 |
| 1D performance | +1.82% | +1.24% |
| AuM | $330.46 M | $444.10 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.68% |
Characteristics
RFG | CSMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | Congress Asset Management |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 98 | 46 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 1, 2006 | August 22, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RFG
USA
94.13%
Other
5.87%
CSMD
USA
92.13%
Other
7.87%
Sectors
RFG
Industrials
23.09%
Technology
21.73%
Healthcare
19.11%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.76%
Other
27.31%
CSMD
Technology
21.11%
Industrials
20.93%
Healthcare
19.65%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.95%
Finance
8.23%
Other
19.13%
Advertisement
Diversification
RFG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
31.2%
CSMD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
46.04%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
RFG
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
3.06%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
2.51%
TTM Technologies, Inc.
2.31%
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
2.30%
Vicor Corp.
2.22%
DigitalOcean Holdings, Inc.
2.21%
Woodward, Inc.
2.15%
MasTec, Inc.
2.13%
TechnipFMC plc
1.92%
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
1.86%
Dycom Industries, Inc.
1.81%
ATI, Inc.
1.78%
Rambus, Inc.
1.69%
Talen Energy Corp.
1.65%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
1.61%
CSMD
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
4.13%
Valmont Industries, Inc.
3.88%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
3.77%
nVent Electric Plc
3.63%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
3.46%
Rambus, Inc.
3.24%
Rubrik, Inc.
3.17%
Repligen Corp.
2.75%
Novanta, Inc.
2.64%
Ligand Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
2.64%
Entegris, Inc.
2.64%
Affirm Holdings, Inc.
2.61%
UFP Technologies, Inc.
2.54%
Dutch Bros, Inc.
2.47%
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
2.47%
Frequently asked questions about RFG and CSMD
How have the RFG and CSMD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 29, 2026, RFG is up 11% year-to-date (YTD), while CSMD has returned 4.29%. That puts RFG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RFG or CSMD?
Year-to-date, the RFG ETF saw +$11M in flows, compared to +$20M for CSMD.
Which ETF is more volatile: RFG or CSMD?
Over the past year, RFG had a volatility of 19.65%, while CSMD experienced 20.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: RFG or CSMD?
As of July 29, 2026, RFG holds $330.46 M in assets under management (AUM), while CSMD manages $444.10 M.
What sectors do the RFG and CSMD ETFs invest in?
RFG leans toward sectors like Industrials, Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, CSMD focuses on Technology, Industrials and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the RFG ETF and CSMD ETF?
RFG top holdings include Sterling Infrastructure, Inc., Carpenter Technology Corp. and TTM Technologies, Inc.. CSMD holds in its top three: Curtiss-Wright Corp., Valmont Industries, Inc. and Carpenter Technology Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: RFG or CSMD?
RFG holds 98 securities with 31.2% of its assets in the top 15. CSMD has 46 securities and a top 15 weight of 46.04%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
