RFGvsCSMDETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) belongs to the US Mid Cap Growth segment. Congress SMid Growth ETF (CSMD) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. RFG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.9% for CSMD. RFG is up 21.08% year-to-date (YTD) with +$6M in YTD flows. CSMD performs worse with 10.85% YTD performance, and +$15M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RFG and CSMD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RFG vs CSMD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/12/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RFG CSMD | +2.44%+4.99% | +15.58%+11.13% | +21.08%+10.85% | +32.03%+13.38% | +71.13%n/a | +46.22%n/a |
| Flows | RFG CSMD | -$642K-$3M | +$5M-$31M | +$6M+$15M | -$17M+$107M | -$41M- | -$125M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RFG CSMD | +24.01%+24.68% | +19.10%+19.78% | +20.20%n/a | +22.83%n/a |
| Max drawdown | RFG CSMD | -6.18%-7.13% | -10.42%-14.80% | -26.58%n/a | -35.14%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RFG CSMD | 13d23d | 45d130d | 380dn/a | 836dn/a |
Trading data
RFG | CSMD | |
Last sale 6/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $63.51 | $35.01 |
| Previous close 06/12/2026 | $63.26 | $34.96 |
| Consolidated volume 06/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CSMD
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexRFG | CSMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/12/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RFG | CSMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $63.51 | $35.01 |
| 1D performance | +0.40% | +0.13% |
| AuM | $356.08 M | $467.12 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.9% |
Characteristics
RFG | CSMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | Congress Asset Management |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 92 | 43 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 1, 2006 | August 22, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RFG
USA
89.01%
Other
10.99%
CSMD
USA
89.05%
Other
10.95%
Sectors
RFG
Industrials
25.66%
Information Techn.
20.09%
Health Care
19.66%
Consumer Discreti.
8.48%
Materials
7.45%
Other
18.66%
CSMD
Industrials
23.5%
Information Techn.
21.68%
Health Care
19.08%
Consumer Discreti.
9.25%
Other
26.49%
Advertisement
Diversification
RFG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
30.66%
CSMD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
48.72%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
RFG
TECHNIPFMC PLC
2.40%
ARROWHEAD PHARMACEUTICALS INC
2.30%
RAMBUS
2.24%
MICHAEL STORES
2.22%
VALARIS LTD
2.19%
INTERDIGITAL
2.17%
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC
2.07%
FABRINET
2.06%
WOODWARD
1.96%
VICOR
1.96%
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY
1.95%
TTM TECHNOLOGIES
1.86%
FIVE BELOW
1.86%
HALOZYME THERAPEUTICS
1.72%
DIGITALOCEAN HOLDINGS
1.68%
CSMD
NVENT ELECTRIC PLC
4.64%
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC
4.48%
RAMBUS
4.32%
CURTISS WRIGHT
4.29%
COMFORT SYSTEMS USA
4.23%
VALMONT INDUSTRS
3.67%
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY
2.95%
PENUMBRA
2.76%
ENTEGRIS
2.76%
BJS WHOLESALE CLUB HOLDINGS INC
2.73%
US7811541090
2.53%
NOVANTA INC
2.40%
BOOT BARN HOLDINGS
2.32%
HAWKINS
2.32%
TRANSMEDICS GROUP
2.32%
Frequently asked questions about RFG and CSMD
How have the RFG and CSMD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 12, 2026, RFG is up 21.08% year-to-date (YTD), while CSMD has returned 10.85%. That puts RFG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RFG or CSMD?
Year-to-date, the RFG ETF saw +$6M in flows, compared to +$15M for CSMD.
Which ETF is more volatile: RFG or CSMD?
Over the past year, RFG had a volatility of 19.1%, while CSMD experienced 19.78%.
Which ETF is bigger: RFG or CSMD?
As of June 12, 2026, RFG holds $356.08 M in assets under management (AUM), while CSMD manages $467.12 M.
What sectors do the RFG and CSMD ETFs invest in?
RFG leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care. Meanwhile, CSMD focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the RFG ETF and CSMD ETF?
RFG top holdings include TECHNIPFMC PLC, ARROWHEAD PHARMACEUTICALS INC and RAMBUS. CSMD holds in its top three: NVENT ELECTRIC PLC, STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC and RAMBUS.
Which ETF is more diversified: RFG or CSMD?
RFG holds 95 securities with 30.66% of its assets in the top 15. CSMD has 45 securities and a top 15 weight of 48.72%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
