RFDAvsFNDXETF Comparison
VS
ALPS Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF (FNDX) is part of the US Large Cap segment. RFDA's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Healthcare. In contrast, FNDX's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. RFDA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.52%, versus 0.25% for FNDX. RFDA is up 15.5% year-to-date (YTD) with -$17M in YTD flows. FNDX performs better with 20.84% YTD performance, and +$1.58B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RFDA and FNDX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RFDA vs FNDX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RFDA FNDX | +0.64%+1.88% | +1.70%+3.20% | +15.50%+20.84% | +19.43%+26.80% | +73.36%+82.05% | +82.05%+90.63% |
| Flows | RFDA FNDX | -$2M+$312M | -$11M+$908M | -$17M+$1.58B | -$17M+$2.25B | -$34M+$5.98B | -$88M+$9.73B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RFDA FNDX | +8.08%+8.21% | +10.54%+10.05% | +14.56%+13.05% | +15.66%+15.04% |
| Max drawdown | RFDA FNDX | -4.41%-3.68% | -5.46%-6.11% | -19.18%-16.26% | -19.18%-18.97% |
| Max drawdown duration | RFDA FNDX | 43d43d | 60d63d | 209d131d | 209d545d |
Trading data
RFDA | FNDX | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $72.33 | $32.52 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $72.06 | $32.58 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RFDA
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexRFDA | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RFDA | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $72.33 | $32.52 |
| 1D performance | +0.38% | -0.18% |
| AuM | $77.80 M | $28.16 B |
| E/R | 0.52% | 0.25% |
Characteristics
RFDA | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | ALPS | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index |
| N° of holdings | 78 | 706 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 7, 2016 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RFDA
USA
94.82%
Other
5.18%
FNDX
USA
97.59%
Other
2.41%
Sectors
RFDA
Finance
22.92%
Technology
15.08%
Healthcare
13.28%
Energy
12.59%
Industrials
8.06%
Other
28.07%
FNDX
Technology
23.26%
Finance
16.86%
Healthcare
12.93%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.61%
Energy
10.34%
Industrials
7.39%
Other
18.62%
Advertisement
Diversification
RFDA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
36.08%
FNDX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.47%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
RFDA
NVIDIA Corp.
3.22%
Johnson & Johnson
3.18%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
3.08%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
2.80%
Citigroup, Inc.
2.56%
Microsoft Corp.
2.56%
ConocoPhillips
2.49%
Phillips 66
2.37%
Merck & Co., Inc.
2.28%
Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
2.03%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
2.02%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.96%
Apple, Inc.
1.91%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.82%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.80%
FNDX
Apple, Inc.
4.51%
Microsoft Corp.
2.84%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
2.50%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.87%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.86%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.69%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.65%
Chevron Corp.
1.62%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.53%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.50%
Intel Corp.
1.44%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.24%
Johnson & Johnson
1.12%
Bank of America Corp.
1.06%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
1.05%
Frequently asked questions about RFDA and FNDX
How have the RFDA and FNDX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, RFDA is up 15.5% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDX has returned 20.84%. That puts FNDX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RFDA or FNDX?
Year-to-date, the RFDA ETF saw -$17M in flows, compared to +$1.58B for FNDX.
Which ETF is more volatile: RFDA or FNDX?
Over the past year, RFDA had a volatility of 10.54%, while FNDX experienced 10.05%.
Which ETF is bigger: RFDA or FNDX?
As of October 16, 2026, RFDA holds $77.80 M in assets under management (AUM), while FNDX manages $28.16 B.
What sectors do the RFDA and FNDX ETFs invest in?
RFDA leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, FNDX focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the RFDA ETF and FNDX ETF?
RFDA top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Johnson & Johnson and JPMorgan Chase & Co.. FNDX holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., Microsoft Corp. and ExxonMobil Holdings Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: RFDA or FNDX?
RFDA holds 78 securities with 36.08% of its assets in the top 15. FNDX has 707 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.47%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
