RFDAvsFNDBETF Comparison
VS
ALPS Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF (FNDB) is part of the US All Cap segment. RFDA's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Healthcare. In contrast, FNDB's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. RFDA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.52%, versus 0.25% for FNDB. RFDA is up 15.5% year-to-date (YTD) with -$17M in YTD flows. FNDB performs better with 20.16% YTD performance, and +$231M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RFDA and FNDB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RFDA vs FNDB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RFDA FNDB | +0.64%+1.65% | +1.70%+2.41% | +15.50%+20.16% | +19.43%+25.97% | +73.36%+79.70% | +82.05%+86.14% |
| Flows | RFDA FNDB | -$2M-$5M | -$11M+$58M | -$17M+$231M | -$17M+$238M | -$34M+$461M | -$88M+$603M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RFDA FNDB | +8.08%+8.31% | +10.54%+10.35% | +14.56%+13.37% | +15.66%+15.32% |
| Max drawdown | RFDA FNDB | -4.41%-3.80% | -5.46%-6.34% | -19.18%-16.85% | -19.18%-19.24% |
| Max drawdown duration | RFDA FNDB | 43d61d | 60d63d | 209d213d | 209d546d |
Trading data
RFDA | FNDB | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $72.33 | $31.54 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $72.06 | $31.61 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RFDA
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexRFDA | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RFDA | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $72.33 | $31.54 |
| 1D performance | +0.38% | -0.22% |
| AuM | $77.80 M | $1.49 B |
| E/R | 0.52% | 0.25% |
Characteristics
RFDA | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | ALPS | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index |
| N° of holdings | 78 | 1412 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 7, 2016 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RFDA
USA
94.82%
Other
5.18%
FNDB
USA
97.64%
Other
2.36%
Sectors
RFDA
Finance
22.92%
Technology
15.08%
Healthcare
13.28%
Energy
12.59%
Industrials
8.06%
Other
28.07%
FNDB
Technology
22.57%
Finance
17.6%
Healthcare
12.6%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.38%
Energy
10.09%
Industrials
7.63%
Other
19.13%
Advertisement
Diversification
RFDA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
36.08%
FNDB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
26.07%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
RFDA
NVIDIA Corp.
3.22%
Johnson & Johnson
3.18%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
3.08%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
2.80%
Citigroup, Inc.
2.56%
Microsoft Corp.
2.56%
ConocoPhillips
2.49%
Phillips 66
2.37%
Merck & Co., Inc.
2.28%
Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
2.03%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
2.02%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.96%
Apple, Inc.
1.91%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.82%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.80%
FNDB
Apple, Inc.
4.32%
Microsoft Corp.
2.68%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
2.34%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.80%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.78%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.61%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.56%
Chevron Corp.
1.52%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.44%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.41%
Intel Corp.
1.37%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.19%
Johnson & Johnson
1.07%
Bank of America Corp.
1.01%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
0.98%
Frequently asked questions about RFDA and FNDB
How have the RFDA and FNDB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, RFDA is up 15.5% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDB has returned 20.16%. That puts FNDB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RFDA or FNDB?
Year-to-date, the RFDA ETF saw -$17M in flows, compared to +$231M for FNDB.
Which ETF is more volatile: RFDA or FNDB?
Over the past year, RFDA had a volatility of 10.54%, while FNDB experienced 10.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: RFDA or FNDB?
As of October 16, 2026, RFDA holds $77.80 M in assets under management (AUM), while FNDB manages $1.49 B.
What sectors do the RFDA and FNDB ETFs invest in?
RFDA leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, FNDB focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the RFDA ETF and FNDB ETF?
RFDA top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Johnson & Johnson and JPMorgan Chase & Co.. FNDB holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., Microsoft Corp. and ExxonMobil Holdings Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: RFDA or FNDB?
RFDA holds 78 securities with 36.08% of its assets in the top 15. FNDB has 1413 securities and a top 15 weight of 26.07%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
