Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
REVSvsIWDETF Comparison
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Value. REVS's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Health Care and Industrials. In contrast, IWD's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. REVS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.19%, versus 0.18% for IWD. REVS is up 2.51% year-to-date (YTD) with +$74M in YTD flows. IWD performs better with 3.7% YTD performance, and -$3.59B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of REVS and IWD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
REVS vs IWD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | REVS IWD | -3.72%-2.79% | +3.44%+3.64% | +2.51%+3.70% | +18.51%+18.79% | +57.22%+56.16% | +75.71%+59.70% |
| Flows | REVS IWD | +$13M+$1.12B | +$79M-$2.93B | +$74M-$3.59B | +$138M-$1.58B | +$173M-$3.30B | +$193M-$2.07B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | REVS IWD | +11.36%+10.89% | +16.05%+15.72% | +13.41%+13.14% | +15.12%+14.80% |
| Max drawdown | REVS IWD | -3.82%-3.44% | -12.32%-12.07% | -16.16%-15.64% | -17.78%-19.11% |
| Max drawdown duration | REVS IWD | 28d9d | 46d52d | 211d213d | 448d700d |
REVS | IWD | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $28.72 | $217.58 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $28.81 | $218.07 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
REVS | IWD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
REVS | IWD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.72 | $217.58 |
| 1D performance | -0.30% | -0.22% |
| AuM | $214.92 M | $68.78 B |
| E/R | 0.19% | 0.18% |
REVS | IWD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | iShares |
| Benchmark | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Value Index | Russell 1000 Value Index |
| N° of holdings | 281 | 789 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 25, 2019 | May 22, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the REVS and IWD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, REVS is up 2.51% year-to-date (YTD), while IWD has returned 3.7%. That puts IWD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: REVS or IWD?
Year-to-date, the REVS ETF saw +$74M in flows, compared to -$3.59B for IWD.
Which ETF is more volatile: REVS or IWD?
Over the past year, REVS had a volatility of 16.05%, while IWD experienced 15.72%.
Which ETF is bigger: REVS or IWD?
As of March 9, 2026, REVS holds $214.92 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWD manages $68.78 B.
What sectors do the REVS and IWD ETFs invest in?
REVS leans toward sectors like Financials, Health Care and Industrials. Meanwhile, IWD focuses on Financials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the REVS ETF and IWD ETF?
REVS top holdings include WELLS FARGO, PROCTERGAMBLE and EXXON. IWD holds in its top three: BERKSHIRE HATHWAY, JPMORGAN CHASE and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: REVS or IWD?
REVS holds 285 securities with 35.3% of its assets in the top 15. IWD has 868 securities and a top 15 weight of 24.21%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
