REMXvsLITPETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) belongs to the Natural Resources segment. Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) is part of the Alternative Energy segment. REMX's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Utilities. In contrast, LITP's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Utilities and Non-Corporate. REMX is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.58%, versus 0.65% for LITP. REMX is up 2.48% year-to-date (YTD) with +$733M in YTD flows. LITP performs worse with -5.43% YTD performance, and +$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of REMX and LITP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
REMX vs LITP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/04/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | REMX LITP | +6.76%+9.86% | -22.12%-24.43% | +2.48%-5.43% | +29.61%+59.54% | +8.57%-16.10% | -27.27%n/a |
| Flows | REMX LITP | +$26M- | -$119M-$4M | +$733M+$5M | +$1.42B+$13M | +$1.67B+$29M | +$1.53B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | REMX LITP | +41.74%+44.13% | +42.48%+47.09% | +35.76%+41.58% | +35.66%n/a |
| Max drawdown | REMX LITP | -33.32%-34.49% | -40.08%-44.08% | -53.20%-67.97% | -72.86%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | REMX LITP | 74d81d | 121d120d | 758d853d | 1614dn/a |
Trading data
REMX | LITP | |
Last sale 9/4/2026 at 1:30 PM | $75.66 | $11.45 |
| Previous close 09/04/2026 | $76.03 | $11.74 |
| Consolidated volume 09/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
REMX | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/4/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
REMX | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $75.66 | $11.45 |
| 1D performance | -0.49% | -2.46% |
| AuM | $2.21 B | $41.36 M |
| E/R | 0.58% | 0.65% |
Characteristics
REMX | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VanEck | Sprott ETFs |
| Benchmark | MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index | Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index |
| N° of holdings | 29 | 39 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 27, 2010 | February 1, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
REMX
China
31.86%
Australia
24.73%
USA
22.48%
Other
20.93%
LITP
Australia
39.51%
Canada
14.6%
China
13.63%
Chile
12.32%
USA
10.96%
Other
8.97%
Sectors
REMX
Non-Energy Materi.
95.84%
Other
4.16%
LITP
Non-Energy Materi.
95.99%
Other
4.01%
Advertisement
Diversification
REMX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.11%
LITP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
85.7%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
REMX
Albemarle Corp.
8.09%
PLS Group Ltd.
7.56%
China Northern Rare Earth (Group) High-Tech Co., Ltd.
7.50%
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.
6.84%
MP Materials Corp.
5.91%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
5.83%
Jinduicheng Molybdenum Co., Ltd.
5.67%
Xiamen Tungsten Co., Ltd.
5.04%
Almonty Industries, Inc.
4.34%
Lianyou Metals Co., Ltd.
4.25%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
3.91%
Shenghe Resources Holding Co., Ltd.
3.81%
Iluka Resources Ltd.
3.67%
Liontown Ltd.
3.03%
AMG Critical Materials NV
2.66%
LITP
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
12.32%
Albemarle Corp.
10.52%
PLS Group Ltd.
9.90%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
9.02%
Liontown Ltd.
6.15%
IGO Ltd.
5.38%
Tianqi Lithium Corp.
4.61%
Lithium Argentina AG
4.44%
Elevra Lithium Ltd.
4.35%
Lithium Americas Corp.
4.23%
Vulcan Energy Resources Ltd.
3.77%
Sigma Lithium Corp.
3.24%
PMET Resources, Inc.
2.80%
Core Lithium Ltd.
2.55%
Standard Lithium Ltd.
2.42%
Frequently asked questions about REMX and LITP
How have the REMX and LITP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 4, 2026, REMX is up 2.48% year-to-date (YTD), while LITP has lost -5.43%. That puts REMX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: REMX or LITP?
Year-to-date, the REMX ETF saw +$733M in flows, compared to +$5M for LITP.
Which ETF is more volatile: REMX or LITP?
Over the past year, REMX had a volatility of 42.48%, while LITP experienced 47.09%.
Which ETF is bigger: REMX or LITP?
As of September 4, 2026, REMX holds $2.21 B in assets under management (AUM), while LITP manages $41.36 M.
What sectors do the REMX and LITP ETFs invest in?
REMX leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, LITP focuses on Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the REMX ETF and LITP ETF?
REMX top holdings include Albemarle Corp., PLS Group Ltd. and China Northern Rare Earth (Group) High-Tech Co., Ltd.. LITP holds in its top three: Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA, Albemarle Corp. and PLS Group Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: REMX or LITP?
REMX holds 29 securities with 78.11% of its assets in the top 15. LITP has 39 securities and a top 15 weight of 85.7%.
Advertisement
Latest news about REMX & LITP
There's an ETF for That? Emerging Markets Without China
June 25, 2026
REMX
There’s an ETF for That? Rare Earth Metals
December 19, 2025
REMX
How PFIC Rules Could Trigger a Year-End Shock for Mining ETFs
October 30, 2025
REMX
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
REMX
Advertisement
The Worst Performing ETFs of 2024
January 8, 2025
LITP
The Worst Performing ETFs of 2024
January 8, 2025
LITP
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
LITP
Notable ETF Filings and Launches Recap: June 2024
June 20, 2024
LITP
Advertisement
