New

ETF model portfolios designed for real investor needs. Discover →

Advertisement
Advertisement

REMXvsCCNRETF Comparison

ETF 1
REMX

VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF

This fund is part of
Natural Resources
+0%
VS
ETF 2
CCNR

ALPS CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF

This fund is part of
Natural Resources
+0%

VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and ALPS CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. REMX's top 3 sector exposures are and Materials. REMX is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.58%, versus 0.39% for CCNR. REMX is up 20.42% year-to-date (YTD) with +$660M in YTD flows. CCNR performs better with 21.28% YTD performance, and -$25M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of REMX and CCNR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

REMX vs CCNR performance and flow charts

Performance

-20.0-15.0-10.0-5.00.0%Mar 2Mar 9Mar 16Mar 23Mar 30

Cumulative Flows

-100 M-50 M0 M50 MMar 2Mar 9Mar 16Mar 23Mar 30

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/02/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
REMX
CCNR
-12.95%-1.90%
+16.51%+19.24%
+20.42%+21.28%
+131.42%+69.62%
+12.42%n/a
+29.43%n/a
Flows
REMX
CCNR
-$112M+$20M
+$660M-$25M
+$660M-$25M
+$1.65B-$163M
+$1.56B-
+$1.53B-
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
REMX
CCNR
+49.89%+18.48%
+40.83%+18.82%
+33.62%n/a
+35.01%n/a
Max drawdown
REMX
CCNR
-21.21%-6.34%
-21.21%-13.83%
-61.47%n/a
-72.86%n/a
Max drawdown duration
REMX
CCNR
31d31d
31d37d
908dn/a
1459dn/a
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
REMX
CCNR
Last sale
4/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
$88.90
$40.04
Previous close
04/02/2026
$88.53
$39.86
Consolidated volume
04/02/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

CCNR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an index

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
REMX
CCNR
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
REMX
CCNR
Last price
$88.90
$40.04
1D performance
+0.42%
+0.46%
AuM$2.59 B$376.51 M
E/R0.58%0.39%
Characteristics
REMX
CCNR
Management strategyPassiveActive
ProviderVanEckALPS
BenchmarkMVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index-
N° of holdings20-
Asset classEquities-
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateOctober 27, 2010July 10, 2024
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

REMX
China
33.99%
Australia
21.48%
USA
21.18%
Canada
14.45%
Other
8.9%
CCNR
Data will be available soon

Sectors

REMX
Materials
79.79%
Other
20.21%
CCNR
Data will be available soon
Advertisement

Diversification

REMX

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

79.63%
CCNR
Data will be available soon

Top 15 holdings

Data as of February 28, 2026
REMX
ALBEMARLE
8.09%
RARE-EARTH
7.68%
LYNAS RARE EARTHS LIMITED
6.76%
CA0203987072
6.65%
XIAMEN TUNGST
6.52%
PILBARA MINERALS
5.84%
JINDUICHENG
5.33%
MP MATERIALS CORPORATION
5.27%
TIANCHENG
5.01%
US8336351056
4.88%
GANFENG LITHIUM CO LTD
4.45%
LIONTOWN RESOURCES LTD
4.13%
HUBEI ZHENHUA CHEMICAL CO LTD
3.04%
CA53681J1030
3.01%
ILUKA RESOURCES LTD
2.96%
CCNR
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about REMX and CCNR

How have the REMX and CCNR ETFs performed in 2026?

As of April 2, 2026, REMX is up 20.42% year-to-date (YTD), while CCNR has returned 21.28%. That puts CCNR better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: REMX or CCNR?

Year-to-date, the REMX ETF saw +$660M in flows, compared to -$25M for CCNR.

Which ETF is more volatile: REMX or CCNR?

Over the past year, REMX had a volatility of 40.83%, while CCNR experienced 18.82%.

Which ETF is bigger: REMX or CCNR?

As of April 2, 2026, REMX holds $2.59 B in assets under management (AUM), while CCNR manages $376.51 M.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
The Active Trader Report

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up

Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up