REMCvsIWRETF Comparison
VS
Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (REMC) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF (IWR) is part of the US Mid Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Technology and Industrials. REMC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.32%, versus 0.18% for IWR. REMC is up 14.06% year-to-date (YTD) with +$323K in YTD flows. IWR performs worse with 13.68% YTD performance, and +$2.97B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of REMC and IWR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
REMC vs IWR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | REMC IWR | -3.32%-4.67% | +3.38%-0.49% | +14.06%+13.68% | n/a+14.16% | n/a+57.88% | n/a+44.08% |
| Flows | REMC IWR | -+$332M | +$2M-$191M | +$323K+$2.97B | -+$4.68B | -+$10.53B | -+$12.34B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | REMC IWR | +10.26%+11.06% | n/a+13.65% | n/a+15.94% | n/a+18.28% |
| Max drawdown | REMC IWR | -4.18%-5.21% | n/a-8.16% | n/a-21.08% | n/a-26.20% |
| Max drawdown duration | REMC IWR | 30d30d | n/a49d | n/a239d | n/a854d |
Trading data
REMC | IWR | |
Last sale 9/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $22.92 | $107.84 |
| Previous close 09/15/2026 | $22.92 | $108.56 |
| Consolidated volume 09/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
REMC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexREMC | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
REMC | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $22.92 | $107.84 |
| 1D performance | +0.00% | -0.66% |
| AuM | $5.73 M | $55.51 B |
| E/R | 0.32% | 0.18% |
Characteristics
REMC | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Russell Midcap Index |
| N° of holdings | 278 | 812 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 11, 2025 | July 17, 2001 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
REMC
USA
97.91%
Other
2.09%
IWR
USA
96.23%
Other
3.77%
Sectors
REMC
Finance
19.89%
Technology
17.55%
Industrials
14.49%
Healthcare
11.93%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.28%
Other
28.86%
IWR
Finance
22.01%
Technology
15.73%
Industrials
14.33%
Healthcare
11.14%
Other
36.79%
Advertisement
Diversification
REMC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
21.05%
IWR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
8.16%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
REMC
Phillips 66
2.37%
Snowflake, Inc.
1.91%
Simon Property Group, Inc.
1.57%
Anglogold Ashanti Plc
1.54%
Occidental Petroleum Corp.
1.51%
The Allstate Corp.
1.42%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
1.39%
Datadog, Inc.
1.33%
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
1.25%
Cardinal Health, Inc.
1.19%
Becton, Dickinson & Co.
1.15%
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
1.13%
Ford Motor Co.
1.11%
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.
1.09%
State Street Corp.
1.09%
IWR
Snowflake, Inc.
0.72%
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
0.67%
Cloudflare, Inc.
0.65%
Datadog, Inc.
0.64%
Phillips 66
0.61%
Royal Caribbean Group
0.59%
Simon Property Group, Inc.
0.53%
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
0.51%
The Allstate Corp.
0.49%
United Rentals, Inc.
0.48%
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
0.48%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
0.45%
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
0.45%
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
0.44%
Realty Income Corp.
0.44%
Frequently asked questions about REMC and IWR
How have the REMC and IWR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 15, 2026, REMC is up 14.06% year-to-date (YTD), while IWR has returned 13.68%. That puts REMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: REMC or IWR?
Year-to-date, the REMC ETF saw +$323K in flows, compared to +$2.97B for IWR.
Which ETF is bigger: REMC or IWR?
As of September 15, 2026, REMC holds $5.73 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWR manages $55.51 B.
What sectors do the REMC and IWR ETFs invest in?
REMC leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, IWR focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the REMC ETF and IWR ETF?
REMC top holdings include Phillips 66, Snowflake, Inc. and Simon Property Group, Inc.. IWR holds in its top three: Snowflake, Inc., Marathon Petroleum Corp. and Cloudflare, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: REMC or IWR?
REMC holds 280 securities with 21.05% of its assets in the top 15. IWR has 823 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.16%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
