REGSvsPCLGETF Comparison
Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS) belongs to the US Large Cap Growth segment. Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. REGS's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. In contrast, PCLG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. REGS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.69% for PCLG. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of REGS and PCLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
REGS vs PCLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | REGS PCLG | +17.49%+11.34% | n/a-6.01% | n/a-10.44% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | REGS PCLG | -$8M+$8M | --$2M | --$2M | -- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | REGS PCLG | n/a+21.78% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | REGS PCLG | n/a-16.21% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | REGS PCLG | n/a90d | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
REGS | PCLG | |
Last sale 5/1/2026 at 1:30 PM | $11.09 | $22.49 |
| Previous close 04/29/2026 | $10.94 | $22.24 |
| Consolidated volume 04/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
REGS | PCLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $11.09 | $22.49 |
| 1D performance | +1.37% | +1.08% |
| AuM | $67.14 M | $95.19 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.69% |
REGS | PCLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Polen Capital |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 58 | 24 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 13, 2026 | September 29, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
