REGSvsFLCGETF Comparison
Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF (FLCG) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. REGS's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. In contrast, FLCG's top sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. REGS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.54% for FLCG. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of REGS and FLCG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
REGS vs FLCG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | REGS FLCG | -1.72%-1.37% | +0.78%-1.99% | n/a-1.65% | n/a+4.56% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | REGS FLCG | -$1M+$14M | -$5M+$83M | -+$221M | -+$313M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | REGS FLCG | +18.42%+16.39% | n/a+16.57% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | REGS FLCG | -8.31%-8.86% | n/a-14.95% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | REGS FLCG | 59d58d | n/a184d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
REGS | FLCG | |
Last sale 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM | $11.16 | $33.76 |
| Previous close 07/30/2026 | $11.07 | $33.45 |
| Consolidated volume 07/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
REGS | FLCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $11.16 | $33.76 |
| 1D performance | +0.81% | +0.93% |
| AuM | $62.67 M | $558.68 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.54% |
REGS | FLCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Federated Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 61 | 96 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 13, 2026 | July 31, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
