Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RECSvsXCHGETF Comparison
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. AB US Equity ETF (XCHG) is part of the US Large Cap segment. RECS's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, XCHG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. RECS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.5% for XCHG. RECS is down -1.84% year-to-date (YTD) with +$282M in YTD flows. XCHG performs better with -1.56% YTD performance, and +$193M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RECS and XCHG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RECS vs XCHG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RECS XCHG | -2.94%-3.03% | -2.73%-1.32% | -1.84%-1.56% | +22.98%n/a | +82.47%n/a | +95.09%n/a |
| Flows | RECS XCHG | +$174M+$195M | +$487M+$852M | +$282M+$193M | +$2.28B- | +$4.23B- | +$4.20B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RECS XCHG | +11.63%+11.28% | +17.97%n/a | +14.48%n/a | +16.55%n/a |
| Max drawdown | RECS XCHG | -3.61%-4.26% | -13.84%n/a | -18.49%n/a | -22.06%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RECS XCHG | 30d58d | 45dn/a | 126dn/a | 573dn/a |
RECS | XCHG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 5:37 PM | $39.32 | $24.18 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $39.47 | $24.24 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RECS | XCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RECS | XCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.32 | $24.18 |
| 1D performance | -0.38% | -0.25% |
| AuM | $4.95 B | $842.29 M |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.5% |
RECS | XCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | AllianceBernstein |
| Benchmark | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 331 | 2909 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 25, 2019 | December 15, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RECS and XCHG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, RECS is down -1.84% year-to-date (YTD), while XCHG has lost -1.56%. That puts XCHG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RECS or XCHG?
Year-to-date, the RECS ETF saw +$282M in flows, compared to +$193M for XCHG.
Which ETF is bigger: RECS or XCHG?
As of March 11, 2026, RECS holds $4.95 B in assets under management (AUM), while XCHG manages $842.29 M.
What sectors do the RECS and XCHG ETFs invest in?
RECS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, XCHG focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the RECS ETF and XCHG ETF?
RECS top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. XCHG holds in its top three: MICROSOFT-T, APPLE and NVIDIA.
Which ETF is more diversified: RECS or XCHG?
RECS holds 336 securities with 45.28% of its assets in the top 15. XCHG has 3593 securities and a top 15 weight of 38.88%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
