BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

RECSvsQLCETF Comparison

ETF 1

RECS

Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF

This fund is part of

US Multi-Factor

+0%

Full RECS fund page

VS

ETF 2

QLC

FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index ETF

This fund is part of

US Multi-Factor

+0%

Full QLC fund page

Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) and FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index ETF (QLC) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. RECS's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, QLC's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. RECS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.26% for QLC. RECS is up 3.01% year-to-date (YTD) with +$500M in YTD flows. QLC performs better with 5.75% YTD performance, and +$123M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RECS and QLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

RECS vs QLC performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 04/24/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	RECS QLC	+7.92%+12.19%	+1.61%+3.49%	+3.01%+5.75%	+31.71%+36.81%	+78.54%+94.39%	+90.79%+98.33%
Flows	RECS QLC	+$197M+$24M	+$305M+$86M	+$500M+$123M	+$2.17B+$314M	+$4.38B+$533M	+$4.42B+$565M

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	RECS QLC	+14.89%+15.67%	+12.37%+12.79%	+14.64%+15.06%	+16.65%+17.03%
Max drawdown	RECS QLC	-8.79%-8.90%	-8.79%-8.90%	-18.49%-18.73%	-22.06%-23.78%
Max drawdown duration	RECS QLC	66d63d	66d63d	126d124d	573d702d

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	RECS	QLC
Last sale 4/28/2026 at 3:37 PM	$42.02	$84.83
Previous close 04/27/2026	$42.24	$85.50
Consolidated volume 04/27/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Replication quality

Data as of March 31, 2026

1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free

	RECS	QLC
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst

Main metrics

Last update 4/28/2026 at 3:37 PM

Live

Closed

	RECS	QLC
Last price	$42.02	$84.83
1D performance	-0.52%	-0.78%
AuM	$5.42 B	$890.81 M
E/R	0.15%	0.26%

Characteristics

	RECS	QLC
Management strategy	Passive	Passive
Provider	Columbia Threadneedle Investments	FlexShares
Benchmark	Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index	Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index
N° of holdings	332	170
Asset class	Equities	Equities
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	September 25, 2019	September 23, 2015
ESG	No	No

More RECS data on Trackinsight

More QLC data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

RECS

USA

92.75%

Other

7.25%

QLC

USA

95.97%

Other

4.03%

Sectors

RECS

Information Techn.

30%

Financials

11.82%

Consumer Discreti.

10.81%

Health Care

10.21%

Communication Ser.

7.97%

Industrials

7.74%

Other

21.45%

QLC

Information Techn.

32.61%

Financials

13.67%

Communication Ser.

12.24%

Health Care

11.31%

Consumer Discreti.

7.54%

Other

22.64%

Diversification

RECS

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

44.33%

QLC

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

43.82%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of March 31, 2026

RECS

NVIDIA

8.52%

APPLE

8.48%

MICROSOFT-T

6.18%

ALPHABET INC-CL

2.79%

META PLATFORMS

2.45%

PROCTERGAMBLE

2.36%

EXXON

2.19%

ALPHABET INC-CL

1.77%

WELLS FARGO

1.73%

BOOKING HOLDINGS

1.63%

CITIGROUP

1.37%

PFIZER

1.33%

MORGAN STANLEY

1.27%

CHEVRON TEXACO

1.18%

CHARLES SCHWAB

1.08%

QLC

NVIDIA

7.16%

APPLE

6.98%

ALPHABET INC-CL

4.01%

MICROSOFT-T

3.91%

ALPHABET INC-CL

3.60%

BROADCOM LIMITED

2.70%

AMAZON.COM INC

2.22%

BERKSHIRE HATHWAY

2.06%

JOHNSON&JOHNSON

2.00%

JPMORGAN CHASE

1.91%

CITIGROUP

1.67%

META PLATFORMS

1.67%

CISCO-T

1.44%

BK OF AMERICA CO

1.32%

THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP

1.17%

Frequently asked questions about RECS and QLC

How have the RECS and QLC ETFs performed in 2026?

As of April 24, 2026, RECS is up 3.01% year-to-date (YTD), while QLC has returned 5.75%. That puts QLC better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RECS or QLC?

Year-to-date, the RECS ETF saw +$500M in flows, compared to +$123M for QLC.

Which ETF is more volatile: RECS or QLC?

Over the past year, RECS had a volatility of 12.37%, while QLC experienced 12.79%.

Which ETF is bigger: RECS or QLC?

As of April 24, 2026, RECS holds $5.42 B in assets under management (AUM), while QLC manages $890.81 M.

What sectors do the RECS and QLC ETFs invest in?

RECS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, QLC focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services.

RECSvsQLCETF Comparison

Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF

FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index ETF

RECS vs QLC performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the RECS and QLC ETFs performed in 2026?

As of April 24, 2026, RECS is up 3.01% year-to-date (YTD), while QLC has returned 5.75%. That puts QLC better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RECS or QLC?

Year-to-date, the RECS ETF saw +$500M in flows, compared to +$123M for QLC.

Which ETF is more volatile: RECS or QLC?

Over the past year, RECS had a volatility of 12.37%, while QLC experienced 12.79%.

Which ETF is bigger: RECS or QLC?

As of April 24, 2026, RECS holds $5.42 B in assets under management (AUM), while QLC manages $890.81 M.

What sectors do the RECS and QLC ETFs invest in?

RECS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, QLC focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services.

What are the top holdings of the RECS ETF and QLC ETF?

RECS top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. QLC holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and ALPHABET INC-CL.

Which ETF is more diversified: RECS or QLC?

RECS holds 338 securities with 44.33% of its assets in the top 15. QLC has 172 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.82%.

Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?