RECSvsQLCETF Comparison
VS
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) and FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index ETF (QLC) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. RECS's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, QLC's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. RECS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.26% for QLC. RECS is up 8.23% year-to-date (YTD) with +$701M in YTD flows. QLC performs better with 11.41% YTD performance, and +$189M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RECS and QLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RECS vs QLC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RECS QLC | +3.23%+0.40% | +5.07%+5.35% | +8.23%+11.41% | +17.54%+24.06% | +71.97%+84.75% | +86.74%+95.24% |
| Flows | RECS QLC | +$56M+$29M | +$206M+$66M | +$701M+$189M | +$2.01B+$298M | +$4.50B+$589M | +$4.70B+$604M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RECS QLC | +10.73%+12.66% | +12.05%+12.99% | +14.57%+15.15% | +16.57%+17.06% |
| Max drawdown | RECS QLC | -3.45%-4.16% | -8.79%-8.90% | -18.49%-18.73% | -22.06%-23.78% |
| Max drawdown duration | RECS QLC | 34d30d | 66d63d | 126d124d | 573d702d |
Trading data
RECS | QLC | |
Last sale 7/28/2026 at 4:20 PM | $44.50 | $90.17 |
| Previous close 07/27/2026 | $44.16 | $89.79 |
| Consolidated volume 07/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RECS | QLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/28/2026 at 4:20 PM
Live
Closed
RECS | QLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $44.50 | $90.17 |
| 1D performance | +0.77% | +0.42% |
| AuM | $5.92 B | $1.00 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.26% |
Characteristics
RECS | QLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | FlexShares |
| Benchmark | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index | Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 444 | 176 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 25, 2019 | September 23, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RECS
USA
98.76%
Other
1.24%
QLC
USA
97.84%
Other
2.16%
Sectors
RECS
Technology
43.15%
Finance
13.39%
Industrials
8.19%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.07%
Healthcare
7.88%
Other
19.31%
QLC
Technology
46.01%
Finance
16.65%
Healthcare
9.74%
Other
27.59%
Advertisement
Diversification
RECS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.71%
QLC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
43.64%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
RECS
NVIDIA Corp.
11.49%
Apple, Inc.
10.88%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
5.44%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.82%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.23%
Bank of America Corp.
1.94%
The TJX Cos., Inc.
1.56%
Altria Group, Inc.
1.33%
Chevron Corp.
1.29%
Citigroup, Inc.
1.21%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.15%
Applied Materials, Inc.
1.13%
Lam Research Corp.
1.10%
CVS Health Corp.
1.09%
Starbucks Corp.
1.05%
QLC
NVIDIA Corp.
6.96%
Apple, Inc.
6.75%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.10%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.64%
Microsoft Corp.
3.40%
Broadcom Inc.
2.84%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.31%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.90%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.87%
Johnson & Johnson
1.85%
Citigroup, Inc.
1.81%
KLA Corp.
1.66%
Applied Materials, Inc.
1.58%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.53%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.43%
Frequently asked questions about RECS and QLC
How have the RECS and QLC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, RECS is up 8.23% year-to-date (YTD), while QLC has returned 11.41%. That puts QLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RECS or QLC?
Year-to-date, the RECS ETF saw +$701M in flows, compared to +$189M for QLC.
Which ETF is more volatile: RECS or QLC?
Over the past year, RECS had a volatility of 12.05%, while QLC experienced 12.99%.
Which ETF is bigger: RECS or QLC?
As of July 24, 2026, RECS holds $5.92 B in assets under management (AUM), while QLC manages $1.00 B.
What sectors do the RECS and QLC ETFs invest in?
RECS leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, QLC focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the RECS ETF and QLC ETF?
RECS top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. QLC holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: RECS or QLC?
RECS holds 454 securities with 45.71% of its assets in the top 15. QLC has 177 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.64%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
