Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RECSvsQLCETF Comparison
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) and FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index ETF (QLC) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. RECS's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, QLC's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. RECS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.26% for QLC. RECS is down -1.84% year-to-date (YTD) with +$282M in YTD flows. QLC performs better with -1.54% YTD performance, and +$89M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RECS and QLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RECS vs QLC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RECS QLC | -2.94%-1.73% | -2.73%-1.28% | -1.84%-1.54% | +22.98%+26.37% | +82.47%+92.72% | +95.09%+96.09% |
| Flows | RECS QLC | +$174M+$23M | +$487M+$95M | +$282M+$89M | +$2.28B+$339M | +$4.23B+$496M | +$4.20B+$529M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RECS QLC | +11.63%+12.73% | +17.97%+18.31% | +14.48%+14.98% | +16.55%+16.91% |
| Max drawdown | RECS QLC | -3.61%-4.48% | -13.84%-13.70% | -18.49%-18.73% | -22.06%-23.78% |
| Max drawdown duration | RECS QLC | 30d31d | 45d45d | 126d124d | 573d702d |
RECS | QLC | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $39.47 | $79.76 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $40.10 | $80.76 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RECS | QLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RECS | QLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.47 | $79.76 |
| 1D performance | -1.57% | -1.24% |
| AuM | $4.95 B | $797.04 M |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.26% |
RECS | QLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | FlexShares |
| Benchmark | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index | Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 331 | 163 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 25, 2019 | September 23, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RECS and QLC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, RECS is down -1.84% year-to-date (YTD), while QLC has lost -1.54%. That puts QLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RECS or QLC?
Year-to-date, the RECS ETF saw +$282M in flows, compared to +$89M for QLC.
Which ETF is more volatile: RECS or QLC?
Over the past year, RECS had a volatility of 17.97%, while QLC experienced 18.31%.
Which ETF is bigger: RECS or QLC?
As of March 11, 2026, RECS holds $4.95 B in assets under management (AUM), while QLC manages $797.04 M.
What sectors do the RECS and QLC ETFs invest in?
RECS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, QLC focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the RECS ETF and QLC ETF?
RECS top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. QLC holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: RECS or QLC?
RECS holds 336 securities with 45.28% of its assets in the top 15. QLC has 166 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.62%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
