RECSvsNULCETF Comparison
VS
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) is part of the US Large Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. RECS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.21% for NULC. RECS is up 9.96% year-to-date (YTD) with +$675M in YTD flows. NULC performs better with 14.48% YTD performance, and +$13M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RECS and NULC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RECS vs NULC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/10/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RECS NULC | -0.51%-2.48% | +5.80%+4.90% | +9.96%+14.48% | +15.94%+17.75% | +78.06%+68.30% | +87.68%+57.90% |
| Flows | RECS NULC | -$12M+$38K | +$44M+$5M | +$675M+$13M | +$1.63B+$16M | +$4.49B+$31M | +$4.67B+$32M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RECS NULC | +10.50%+12.61% | +12.01%+13.69% | +14.56%+15.14% | +16.59%+17.27% |
| Max drawdown | RECS NULC | -2.96%-3.80% | -8.79%-9.01% | -18.49%-18.49% | -22.06%-29.63% |
| Max drawdown duration | RECS NULC | 23d28d | 66d75d | 126d203d | 573d835d |
Trading data
RECS | NULC | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.19 | $55.16 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $44.91 | $54.74 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RECS | NULC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RECS | NULC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.19 | $55.16 |
| 1D performance | +0.62% | +0.78% |
| AuM | $5.99 B | $71.15 M |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.21% |
Characteristics
RECS | NULC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Nuveen |
| Benchmark | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index | MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large-Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 442 | 137 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 25, 2019 | June 4, 2019 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RECS
USA
99.05%
Other
0.95%
NULC
USA
94.21%
Other
5.79%
Sectors
RECS
Technology
41.49%
Finance
13.66%
Healthcare
8.46%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.77%
Industrials
7.76%
Other
20.86%
NULC
Technology
44.08%
Finance
12.55%
Healthcare
10.09%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.14%
Industrials
7.83%
Other
16.3%
Advertisement
Diversification
RECS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.24%
NULC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
38.35%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
RECS
NVIDIA Corp.
12.00%
Apple, Inc.
11.28%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.90%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.40%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.29%
Bank of America Corp.
2.03%
Chevron Corp.
1.55%
The TJX Cos., Inc.
1.40%
Altria Group, Inc.
1.20%
Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
1.13%
Citigroup, Inc.
1.08%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.03%
Starbucks Corp.
1.03%
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
0.97%
CVS Health Corp.
0.95%
NULC
NVIDIA Corp.
8.10%
Broadcom Inc.
3.78%
Microsoft Corp.
3.63%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.95%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.55%
Visa, Inc.
1.94%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.89%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.83%
The Coca-Cola Co.
1.79%
Western Digital Corp.
1.71%
Morgan Stanley
1.70%
Costco Wholesale Corp.
1.68%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
1.68%
GE Vernova, Inc.
1.57%
Procter & Gamble Co.
1.55%
Frequently asked questions about RECS and NULC
How have the RECS and NULC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 10, 2026, RECS is up 9.96% year-to-date (YTD), while NULC has returned 14.48%. That puts NULC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RECS or NULC?
Year-to-date, the RECS ETF saw +$675M in flows, compared to +$13M for NULC.
Which ETF is more volatile: RECS or NULC?
Over the past year, RECS had a volatility of 12.01%, while NULC experienced 13.69%.
Which ETF is bigger: RECS or NULC?
As of September 10, 2026, RECS holds $5.99 B in assets under management (AUM), while NULC manages $71.15 M.
What sectors do the RECS and NULC ETFs invest in?
RECS leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, NULC focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the RECS ETF and NULC ETF?
RECS top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. NULC holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Broadcom Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: RECS or NULC?
RECS holds 451 securities with 45.24% of its assets in the top 15. NULC has 137 securities and a top 15 weight of 38.35%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
