RECSvsLCTUETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
LCTU
BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) is part of the segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. RECS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.3% for LCTU. RECS is up 3.01% year-to-date (YTD) with +$500M in YTD flows. LCTU performs better with 3.55% YTD performance, and -$27M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RECS and LCTU below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RECS vs LCTU performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RECS LCTU | +7.92%+8.57% | +1.61%+2.27% | +3.01%+3.55% | +31.71%+30.19% | +78.54%+75.06% | +90.79%+72.62% |
| Flows | RECS LCTU | +$197M-$2M | +$305M-$33M | +$500M-$27M | +$2.17B-$15M | +$4.38B-$682M | +$4.42B-$534M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RECS LCTU | +14.89%+15.61% | +12.37%+12.78% | +14.64%+15.26% | +16.65%+17.31% |
| Max drawdown | RECS LCTU | -8.79%-9.07% | -8.79%-9.37% | -18.49%-19.80% | -22.06%-25.94% |
| Max drawdown duration | RECS LCTU | 66d77d | 66d93d | 126d127d | 573d744d |
Trading data
RECS | LCTU | |
Last sale 4/28/2026 at 5:06 PM | $42.02 | $76.00 |
| Previous close 04/27/2026 | $42.24 | $76.56 |
| Consolidated volume 04/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LCTU
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexRECS | LCTU | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/28/2026 at 5:06 PM
Live
Closed
RECS | LCTU | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $42.02 | $76.00 |
| 1D performance | -0.52% | -0.74% |
| AuM | $5.42 B | $1.44 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.3% |
Characteristics
RECS | LCTU | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | iShares |
| Benchmark | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 332 | 288 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 25, 2019 | April 8, 2021 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RECS
USA
92.75%
Other
7.25%
LCTU
USA
96.34%
Other
3.66%
Sectors
RECS
Information Techn.
30%
Financials
11.82%
Consumer Discreti.
10.81%
Health Care
10.21%
Communication Ser.
7.97%
Industrials
7.74%
Other
21.45%
LCTU
Information Techn.
32.54%
Financials
11.03%
Consumer Discreti.
10.13%
Health Care
9.61%
Communication Ser.
9.56%
Industrials
8.48%
Other
18.65%
Advertisement
Diversification
RECS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
44.33%
LCTU
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
39.16%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
RECS
NVIDIA
8.52%
APPLE
8.48%
MICROSOFT-T
6.18%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.79%
META PLATFORMS
2.45%
PROCTERGAMBLE
2.36%
EXXON
2.19%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.77%
WELLS FARGO
1.73%
BOOKING HOLDINGS
1.63%
CITIGROUP
1.37%
PFIZER
1.33%
MORGAN STANLEY
1.27%
CHEVRON TEXACO
1.18%
CHARLES SCHWAB
1.08%
LCTU
NVIDIA
7.31%
APPLE
7.12%
MICROSOFT-T
3.65%
AMAZON.COM INC
2.78%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.47%
META PLATFORMS
2.35%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.19%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.94%
TESLA
1.80%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.46%
JPMORGAN CHASE
1.28%
BK OF AMERICA CO
1.25%
LILLY
1.23%
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORD
1.22%
ECOLAB
1.10%
Frequently asked questions about RECS and LCTU
How have the RECS and LCTU ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 24, 2026, RECS is up 3.01% year-to-date (YTD), while LCTU has returned 3.55%. That puts LCTU better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RECS or LCTU?
Year-to-date, the RECS ETF saw +$500M in flows, compared to -$27M for LCTU.
Which ETF is more volatile: RECS or LCTU?
Over the past year, RECS had a volatility of 12.37%, while LCTU experienced 12.78%.
Which ETF is bigger: RECS or LCTU?
As of April 24, 2026, RECS holds $5.42 B in assets under management (AUM), while LCTU manages $1.44 B.
What sectors do the RECS and LCTU ETFs invest in?
RECS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, LCTU focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the RECS ETF and LCTU ETF?
RECS top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. LCTU holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: RECS or LCTU?
RECS holds 338 securities with 44.33% of its assets in the top 15. LCTU has 308 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.16%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
