RECSvsLCTUETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
LCTU
BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) is part of the segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. RECS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.3% for LCTU. RECS is up 9.96% year-to-date (YTD) with +$675M in YTD flows. LCTU performs better with 10.53% YTD performance, and -$321M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RECS and LCTU below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RECS vs LCTU performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/10/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RECS LCTU | -0.51%-2.07% | +5.80%+5.13% | +9.96%+10.53% | +15.94%+15.81% | +78.06%+70.85% | +87.68%+71.66% |
| Flows | RECS LCTU | -$12M+$6M | +$44M-$271M | +$675M-$321M | +$1.63B-$306M | +$4.49B-$891M | +$4.67B-$796M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RECS LCTU | +10.50%+12.01% | +12.01%+12.97% | +14.56%+15.31% | +16.59%+17.40% |
| Max drawdown | RECS LCTU | -2.96%-3.16% | -8.79%-9.37% | -18.49%-19.80% | -22.06%-25.94% |
| Max drawdown duration | RECS LCTU | 23d16d | 66d93d | 126d127d | 573d744d |
Trading data
RECS | LCTU | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.19 | $82.15 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $44.91 | $81.47 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LCTU
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexRECS | LCTU | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RECS | LCTU | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.19 | $82.15 |
| 1D performance | +0.62% | +0.84% |
| AuM | $5.99 B | $1.23 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.3% |
Characteristics
RECS | LCTU | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | iShares |
| Benchmark | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 442 | 324 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 25, 2019 | April 8, 2021 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RECS
USA
99.05%
Other
0.95%
LCTU
USA
98.48%
Other
1.52%
Sectors
RECS
Technology
41.49%
Finance
13.66%
Healthcare
8.46%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.77%
Industrials
7.76%
Other
20.86%
LCTU
Technology
43.01%
Finance
14.56%
Healthcare
9.06%
Industrials
8.45%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.36%
Other
16.55%
Advertisement
Diversification
RECS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.24%
LCTU
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
39.92%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
RECS
NVIDIA Corp.
12.00%
Apple, Inc.
11.28%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.90%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.40%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.29%
Bank of America Corp.
2.03%
Chevron Corp.
1.55%
The TJX Cos., Inc.
1.40%
Altria Group, Inc.
1.20%
Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
1.13%
Citigroup, Inc.
1.08%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.03%
Starbucks Corp.
1.03%
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
0.97%
CVS Health Corp.
0.95%
LCTU
Apple, Inc.
7.65%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.20%
Microsoft Corp.
4.09%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.82%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.60%
Broadcom Inc.
2.38%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.01%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.82%
Bank of America Corp.
1.63%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.38%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.30%
Tesla, Inc.
1.29%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.27%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.27%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.21%
Frequently asked questions about RECS and LCTU
How have the RECS and LCTU ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 10, 2026, RECS is up 9.96% year-to-date (YTD), while LCTU has returned 10.53%. That puts LCTU better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RECS or LCTU?
Year-to-date, the RECS ETF saw +$675M in flows, compared to -$321M for LCTU.
Which ETF is more volatile: RECS or LCTU?
Over the past year, RECS had a volatility of 12.01%, while LCTU experienced 12.97%.
Which ETF is bigger: RECS or LCTU?
As of September 10, 2026, RECS holds $5.99 B in assets under management (AUM), while LCTU manages $1.23 B.
What sectors do the RECS and LCTU ETFs invest in?
RECS leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, LCTU focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the RECS ETF and LCTU ETF?
RECS top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. LCTU holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: RECS or LCTU?
RECS holds 451 securities with 45.24% of its assets in the top 15. LCTU has 325 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.92%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
