Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RECSvsFVALETF Comparison
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) is part of the US Large Cap Value segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Both RECS and FVAL have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%. RECS is down -1.84% year-to-date (YTD) with +$282M in YTD flows. FVAL performs worse with -2% YTD performance, and +$19M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RECS and FVAL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RECS vs FVAL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RECS FVAL | -2.94%-3.09% | -2.73%-1.34% | -1.84%-2.00% | +22.98%+21.23% | +82.47%+71.32% | +95.09%+73.67% |
| Flows | RECS FVAL | +$174M+$8M | +$487M+$12M | +$282M+$19M | +$2.28B-$32M | +$4.23B+$304M | +$4.20B+$466M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RECS FVAL | +11.63%+11.22% | +17.97%+17.71% | +14.48%+14.24% | +16.55%+16.34% |
| Max drawdown | RECS FVAL | -3.61%-4.81% | -13.84%-13.50% | -18.49%-18.14% | -22.06%-23.38% |
| Max drawdown duration | RECS FVAL | 30d38d | 45d45d | 126d131d | 573d702d |
RECS | FVAL | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 3:47 PM | $39.43 | $70.53 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $39.47 | $70.88 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RECS | FVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RECS | FVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.43 | $70.53 |
| 1D performance | -0.11% | -0.49% |
| AuM | $4.95 B | $1.11 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.15% |
RECS | FVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index | Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 331 | 121 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 25, 2019 | September 12, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RECS and FVAL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, RECS is down -1.84% year-to-date (YTD), while FVAL has lost -2%. That puts RECS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RECS or FVAL?
Year-to-date, the RECS ETF saw +$282M in flows, compared to +$19M for FVAL.
Which ETF is more volatile: RECS or FVAL?
Over the past year, RECS had a volatility of 17.97%, while FVAL experienced 17.71%.
Which ETF is bigger: RECS or FVAL?
As of March 11, 2026, RECS holds $4.95 B in assets under management (AUM), while FVAL manages $1.11 B.
What sectors do the RECS and FVAL ETFs invest in?
RECS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, FVAL focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the RECS ETF and FVAL ETF?
RECS top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. FVAL holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: RECS or FVAL?
RECS holds 336 securities with 45.28% of its assets in the top 15. FVAL has 125 securities and a top 15 weight of 46.71%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
