RECSvsFVALETF Comparison
VS
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) is part of the US Large Cap Value segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Both RECS and FVAL have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%. RECS is up 9.96% year-to-date (YTD) with +$675M in YTD flows. FVAL performs better with 13.86% YTD performance, and +$104M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RECS and FVAL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RECS vs FVAL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/10/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RECS FVAL | -0.51%-1.93% | +5.80%+6.66% | +9.96%+13.86% | +15.94%+22.90% | +78.06%+72.69% | +87.68%+81.07% |
| Flows | RECS FVAL | -$12M+$12M | +$44M+$52M | +$675M+$104M | +$1.63B+$114M | +$4.49B+$361M | +$4.67B+$488M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RECS FVAL | +10.50%+10.98% | +12.01%+12.07% | +14.56%+14.31% | +16.59%+16.43% |
| Max drawdown | RECS FVAL | -2.96%-2.66% | -8.79%-8.88% | -18.49%-18.14% | -22.06%-23.38% |
| Max drawdown duration | RECS FVAL | 23d24d | 66d72d | 126d131d | 573d702d |
Trading data
RECS | FVAL | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.19 | $82.32 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $44.91 | $81.65 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RECS | FVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RECS | FVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.19 | $82.32 |
| 1D performance | +0.62% | +0.82% |
| AuM | $5.99 B | $1.36 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
RECS | FVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index | Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 442 | 124 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 25, 2019 | September 12, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RECS
USA
99.05%
Other
0.95%
FVAL
USA
97.99%
Other
2.01%
Sectors
RECS
Technology
41.49%
Finance
13.66%
Healthcare
8.46%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.77%
Industrials
7.76%
Other
20.86%
FVAL
Technology
39.97%
Finance
15.9%
Healthcare
10.76%
Industrials
8.83%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.76%
Other
15.78%
Advertisement
Diversification
RECS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.24%
FVAL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
47.86%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
RECS
NVIDIA Corp.
12.00%
Apple, Inc.
11.28%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.90%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.40%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.29%
Bank of America Corp.
2.03%
Chevron Corp.
1.55%
The TJX Cos., Inc.
1.40%
Altria Group, Inc.
1.20%
Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
1.13%
Citigroup, Inc.
1.08%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.03%
Starbucks Corp.
1.03%
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
0.97%
CVS Health Corp.
0.95%
FVAL
Apple, Inc.
8.01%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.60%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.31%
Microsoft Corp.
4.81%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.75%
Broadcom Inc.
3.35%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.69%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.11%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.87%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.86%
Visa, Inc.
1.46%
Johnson & Johnson
1.42%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.23%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.20%
Bank of America Corp.
1.19%
Frequently asked questions about RECS and FVAL
How have the RECS and FVAL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 10, 2026, RECS is up 9.96% year-to-date (YTD), while FVAL has returned 13.86%. That puts FVAL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RECS or FVAL?
Year-to-date, the RECS ETF saw +$675M in flows, compared to +$104M for FVAL.
Which ETF is more volatile: RECS or FVAL?
Over the past year, RECS had a volatility of 12.01%, while FVAL experienced 12.07%.
Which ETF is bigger: RECS or FVAL?
As of September 10, 2026, RECS holds $5.99 B in assets under management (AUM), while FVAL manages $1.36 B.
What sectors do the RECS and FVAL ETFs invest in?
RECS leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, FVAL focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the RECS ETF and FVAL ETF?
RECS top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. FVAL holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: RECS or FVAL?
RECS holds 451 securities with 45.24% of its assets in the top 15. FVAL has 124 securities and a top 15 weight of 47.86%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
