RECSvsFVALETF Comparison
VS
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) is part of the US Large Cap Value segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Both RECS and FVAL have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%. RECS is up 3.01% year-to-date (YTD) with +$500M in YTD flows. FVAL performs better with 4.66% YTD performance, and +$45M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RECS and FVAL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RECS vs FVAL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RECS FVAL | +7.92%+11.48% | +1.61%+2.49% | +3.01%+4.66% | +31.71%+32.08% | +78.54%+71.82% | +90.79%+74.74% |
| Flows | RECS FVAL | +$197M+$25M | +$305M+$41M | +$500M+$45M | +$2.17B+$48M | +$4.38B+$341M | +$4.42B+$444M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RECS FVAL | +14.89%+14.11% | +12.37%+12.16% | +14.64%+14.27% | +16.65%+16.43% |
| Max drawdown | RECS FVAL | -8.79%-8.88% | -8.79%-8.88% | -18.49%-18.14% | -22.06%-23.38% |
| Max drawdown duration | RECS FVAL | 66d72d | 66d72d | 126d131d | 573d702d |
Trading data
RECS | FVAL | |
Last sale 4/28/2026 at 5:06 PM | $42.02 | $75.06 |
| Previous close 04/27/2026 | $42.24 | $75.29 |
| Consolidated volume 04/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RECS | FVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/28/2026 at 5:06 PM
Live
Closed
RECS | FVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $42.02 | $75.06 |
| 1D performance | -0.52% | -0.31% |
| AuM | $5.42 B | $1.20 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
RECS | FVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index | Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 332 | 120 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 25, 2019 | September 12, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RECS
USA
92.75%
Other
7.25%
FVAL
USA
96.61%
Other
3.39%
Sectors
RECS
Information Techn.
30%
Financials
11.82%
Consumer Discreti.
10.81%
Health Care
10.21%
Communication Ser.
7.97%
Industrials
7.74%
Other
21.45%
FVAL
Information Techn.
33.87%
Financials
10.51%
Consumer Discreti.
10.1%
Health Care
10.04%
Communication Ser.
9.31%
Industrials
9.2%
Other
16.97%
Advertisement
Diversification
RECS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
44.33%
FVAL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.43%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
RECS
NVIDIA
8.52%
APPLE
8.48%
MICROSOFT-T
6.18%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.79%
META PLATFORMS
2.45%
PROCTERGAMBLE
2.36%
EXXON
2.19%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.77%
WELLS FARGO
1.73%
BOOKING HOLDINGS
1.63%
CITIGROUP
1.37%
PFIZER
1.33%
MORGAN STANLEY
1.27%
CHEVRON TEXACO
1.18%
CHARLES SCHWAB
1.08%
FVAL
NVIDIA
7.56%
APPLE
6.86%
ALPHABET INC-CL
5.06%
MICROSOFT-T
5.05%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.81%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.13%
META PLATFORMS
2.20%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
2.05%
LILLY
1.59%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
1.53%
EXXON
1.46%
VISA INCORPORATION
1.38%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY
1.37%
WALMART INC
1.23%
ABBVIE
1.15%
Frequently asked questions about RECS and FVAL
How have the RECS and FVAL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 24, 2026, RECS is up 3.01% year-to-date (YTD), while FVAL has returned 4.66%. That puts FVAL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RECS or FVAL?
Year-to-date, the RECS ETF saw +$500M in flows, compared to +$45M for FVAL.
Which ETF is more volatile: RECS or FVAL?
Over the past year, RECS had a volatility of 12.37%, while FVAL experienced 12.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: RECS or FVAL?
As of April 24, 2026, RECS holds $5.42 B in assets under management (AUM), while FVAL manages $1.20 B.
What sectors do the RECS and FVAL ETFs invest in?
RECS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, FVAL focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the RECS ETF and FVAL ETF?
RECS top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. FVAL holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: RECS or FVAL?
RECS holds 338 securities with 44.33% of its assets in the top 15. FVAL has 123 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.43%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
