Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RECSvsFLRGETF Comparison
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) and Fidelity US Multifactor ETF (FLRG) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. RECS's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, FLRG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. Both RECS and FLRG have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%. RECS is down -1.84% year-to-date (YTD) with +$282M in YTD flows. FLRG performs better with -1.17% YTD performance, and -$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RECS and FLRG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RECS vs FLRG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RECS FLRG | -2.94%-1.35% | -2.73%-1.63% | -1.84%-1.17% | +22.98%+15.85% | +82.47%+66.73% | +95.09%+81.29% |
| Flows | RECS FLRG | +$174M-$2M | +$487M+$88K | +$282M-$2M | +$2.28B+$35M | +$4.23B+$195M | +$4.20B+$210M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RECS FLRG | +11.63%+10.29% | +17.97%+15.92% | +14.48%+13.46% | +16.55%+15.26% |
| Max drawdown | RECS FLRG | -3.61%-3.61% | -13.84%-11.50% | -18.49%-16.74% | -22.06%-20.04% |
| Max drawdown duration | RECS FLRG | 30d43d | 45d38d | 126d154d | 573d604d |
RECS | FLRG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $39.21 | $37.25 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $39.47 | $37.51 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RECS | FLRG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RECS | FLRG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.21 | $37.25 |
| 1D performance | -0.67% | -0.69% |
| AuM | $4.95 B | $266.42 M |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.15% |
RECS | FLRG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index | Fidelity U.S. Multifactor Index |
| N° of holdings | 331 | 101 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 25, 2019 | September 15, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RECS and FLRG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, RECS is down -1.84% year-to-date (YTD), while FLRG has lost -1.17%. That puts FLRG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RECS or FLRG?
Year-to-date, the RECS ETF saw +$282M in flows, compared to -$2M for FLRG.
Which ETF is more volatile: RECS or FLRG?
Over the past year, RECS had a volatility of 17.97%, while FLRG experienced 15.92%.
Which ETF is bigger: RECS or FLRG?
As of March 11, 2026, RECS holds $4.95 B in assets under management (AUM), while FLRG manages $266.42 M.
What sectors do the RECS and FLRG ETFs invest in?
RECS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, FLRG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the RECS ETF and FLRG ETF?
RECS top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. FLRG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: RECS or FLRG?
RECS holds 336 securities with 45.28% of its assets in the top 15. FLRG has 101 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.11%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.