Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RECSvsAPUEETF Comparison
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) and ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF (APUE) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. RECS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.31% for APUE. RECS is down -1.84% year-to-date (YTD) with +$282M in YTD flows. APUE performs worse with -2.02% YTD performance, and +$84M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RECS and APUE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RECS vs APUE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RECS APUE | -2.94%-2.55% | -2.73%-1.93% | -1.84%-2.02% | +22.98%+21.14% | +82.47%n/a | +95.09%n/a |
| Flows | RECS APUE | +$174M+$31M | +$487M+$90M | +$282M+$84M | +$2.28B+$231M | +$4.23B- | +$4.20B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RECS APUE | +11.63%+11.92% | +17.97%+18.10% | +14.48%n/a | +16.55%n/a |
| Max drawdown | RECS APUE | -3.61%-4.52% | -13.84%-13.59% | -18.49%n/a | -22.06%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RECS APUE | 30d31d | 45d45d | 126dn/a | 573dn/a |
RECS | APUE | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $39.47 | $40.75 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $40.10 | $41.41 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RECS | APUE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RECS | APUE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.47 | $40.75 |
| 1D performance | -1.57% | -1.59% |
| AuM | $4.95 B | $2.20 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.31% |
RECS | APUE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Envestnet Asset Management |
| Benchmark | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 331 | 2239 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 25, 2019 | May 3, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RECS and APUE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, RECS is down -1.84% year-to-date (YTD), while APUE has lost -2.02%. That puts RECS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RECS or APUE?
Year-to-date, the RECS ETF saw +$282M in flows, compared to +$84M for APUE.
Which ETF is more volatile: RECS or APUE?
Over the past year, RECS had a volatility of 17.97%, while APUE experienced 18.1%.
Which ETF is bigger: RECS or APUE?
As of March 11, 2026, RECS holds $4.95 B in assets under management (AUM), while APUE manages $2.20 B.
What sectors do the RECS and APUE ETFs invest in?
RECS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, APUE focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the RECS ETF and APUE ETF?
RECS top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. APUE holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: RECS or APUE?
RECS holds 336 securities with 45.28% of its assets in the top 15. APUE has 2313 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.55%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
