Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RDVIvsSPHBETF Comparison
FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF
FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) belongs to the US High Dividend segment. Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) is part of the US Large Cap segment. RDVI's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, SPHB's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. RDVI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.25% for SPHB. RDVI is up 1.76% year-to-date (YTD) with +$242M in YTD flows. SPHB performs better with 2.2% YTD performance, and -$44M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RDVI and SPHB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RDVI vs SPHB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RDVI SPHB | -2.98%-4.25% | +0.48%-1.12% | +1.76%+2.20% | +20.96%+52.37% | +65.29%+85.91% | n/a+74.46% |
| Flows | RDVI SPHB | +$97M-$87M | +$310M+$46M | +$242M-$44M | +$876M+$154M | +$2.54B-$370M | --$1.31B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RDVI SPHB | +14.94%+23.87% | +18.42%+30.15% | +16.49%+24.69% | n/a+27.29% |
| Max drawdown | RDVI SPHB | -4.75%-5.38% | -13.13%-20.30% | -18.32%-29.29% | n/a-31.53% |
| Max drawdown duration | RDVI SPHB | 13d14d | 45d46d | 219d151d | n/a765d |
RDVI | SPHB | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.67 | $116.34 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $26.14 | $119.50 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RDVI | SPHB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RDVI | SPHB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.67 | $116.34 |
| 1D performance | -1.80% | -2.64% |
| AuM | $2.84 B | $579.54 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.25% |
RDVI | SPHB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | S&P 500 High Beta Index |
| N° of holdings | 68 | 96 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 19, 2022 | May 5, 2011 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RDVI and SPHB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, RDVI is up 1.76% year-to-date (YTD), while SPHB has returned 2.2%. That puts SPHB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RDVI or SPHB?
Year-to-date, the RDVI ETF saw +$242M in flows, compared to -$44M for SPHB.
Which ETF is more volatile: RDVI or SPHB?
Over the past year, RDVI had a volatility of 18.42%, while SPHB experienced 30.15%.
Which ETF is bigger: RDVI or SPHB?
As of March 11, 2026, RDVI holds $2.84 B in assets under management (AUM), while SPHB manages $579.54 M.
What sectors do the RDVI and SPHB ETFs invest in?
RDVI leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, SPHB focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the RDVI ETF and SPHB ETF?
RDVI top holdings include US5128073062, APPLIED MATERIAL and KLA CORPORATION. SPHB holds in its top three: MICRON TECHNOLOGY, MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY and ALBEMARLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: RDVI or SPHB?
RDVI holds 71 securities with 37.9% of its assets in the top 15. SPHB has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 21.74%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
