Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RDVIvsJHMLETF Comparison
FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF
FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) belongs to the US High Dividend segment. John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. RDVI's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, JHML's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. RDVI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.32% for JHML. RDVI is down -0.08% year-to-date (YTD) with +$242M in YTD flows. JHML performs worse with -0.81% YTD performance, and +$22M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RDVI and JHML below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RDVI vs JHML performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RDVI JHML | -3.03%-2.77% | -0.80%-0.89% | -0.08%-0.81% | +19.07%+19.54% | +62.30%+67.83% | n/a+66.97% |
| Flows | RDVI JHML | +$91M+$20M | +$310M+$26M | +$242M+$22M | +$876M-$17M | +$2.54B-$38M | -+$30M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RDVI JHML | +15.36%+11.52% | +18.52%+17.54% | +16.52%+14.24% | n/a+16.32% |
| Max drawdown | RDVI JHML | -6.20%-4.36% | -13.13%-13.37% | -18.32%-18.02% | n/a-23.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | RDVI JHML | 14d31d | 45d45d | 219d127d | n/a708d |
RDVI | JHML | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 7:01 PM | $25.67 | $79.08 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $25.67 | $79.14 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RDVI | JHML | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RDVI | JHML | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.67 | $79.08 |
| 1D performance | +0.00% | -0.07% |
| AuM | $2.78 B | $1.05 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.32% |
RDVI | JHML | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | John Hancock Investments |
| Benchmark | - | John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 68 | 712 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 19, 2022 | September 28, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RDVI and JHML ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, RDVI is down -0.08% year-to-date (YTD), while JHML has lost -0.81%. That puts RDVI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RDVI or JHML?
Year-to-date, the RDVI ETF saw +$242M in flows, compared to +$22M for JHML.
Which ETF is more volatile: RDVI or JHML?
Over the past year, RDVI had a volatility of 18.52%, while JHML experienced 17.54%.
Which ETF is bigger: RDVI or JHML?
As of March 12, 2026, RDVI holds $2.78 B in assets under management (AUM), while JHML manages $1.05 B.
What sectors do the RDVI and JHML ETFs invest in?
RDVI leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, JHML focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the RDVI ETF and JHML ETF?
RDVI top holdings include US5128073062, APPLIED MATERIAL and KLA CORPORATION. JHML holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: RDVI or JHML?
RDVI holds 71 securities with 37.9% of its assets in the top 15. JHML has 773 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.75%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.