Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RDVIvsFCTRETF Comparison
FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF
FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) belongs to the US High Dividend segment. First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. RDVI's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, FCTR's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. RDVI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.65% for FCTR. RDVI is down -0.08% year-to-date (YTD) with +$242M in YTD flows. FCTR performs better with 0.17% YTD performance, and -$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RDVI and FCTR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RDVI vs FCTR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RDVI FCTR | -3.03%-2.88% | -0.80%-0.63% | -0.08%+0.17% | +19.07%+18.34% | +62.30%+40.44% | n/a+7.44% |
| Flows | RDVI FCTR | +$91M-$2M | +$310M-$2M | +$242M-$2M | +$876M-$20M | +$2.54B-$186M | --$29M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RDVI FCTR | +15.36%+16.34% | +18.52%+20.93% | +16.52%+18.61% | n/a+19.89% |
| Max drawdown | RDVI FCTR | -6.20%-6.09% | -13.13%-12.75% | -18.32%-22.60% | n/a-37.23% |
| Max drawdown duration | RDVI FCTR | 14d49d | 45d37d | 219d231d | n/a1186d |
RDVI | FCTR | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 7:01 PM | $25.67 | $35.73 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $25.67 | $36.08 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RDVI | FCTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RDVI | FCTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.67 | $35.73 |
| 1D performance | +0.00% | -0.98% |
| AuM | $2.78 B | $51.80 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.65% |
RDVI | FCTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | First Trust |
| Benchmark | - | Lunt Capital Large Cap Factor Rotation Index |
| N° of holdings | 68 | 152 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 19, 2022 | July 25, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RDVI and FCTR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, RDVI is down -0.08% year-to-date (YTD), while FCTR has returned 0.17%. That puts FCTR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RDVI or FCTR?
Year-to-date, the RDVI ETF saw +$242M in flows, compared to -$2M for FCTR.
Which ETF is more volatile: RDVI or FCTR?
Over the past year, RDVI had a volatility of 18.52%, while FCTR experienced 20.93%.
Which ETF is bigger: RDVI or FCTR?
As of March 12, 2026, RDVI holds $2.78 B in assets under management (AUM), while FCTR manages $51.80 M.
What sectors do the RDVI and FCTR ETFs invest in?
RDVI leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, FCTR focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the RDVI ETF and FCTR ETF?
RDVI top holdings include US5128073062, APPLIED MATERIAL and KLA CORPORATION. FCTR holds in its top three: US7731211089, WARNER BROS. DISCOVERY and WESTERN DIGITAL.
Which ETF is more diversified: RDVI or FCTR?
RDVI holds 71 securities with 37.9% of its assets in the top 15. FCTR has 159 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.21%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
