Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RDIVvsCDCETF Comparison
VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) belongs to the US High Dividend segment. VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. RDIV's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, CDC's top sector exposures are Utilities, Consumer Staples and Financials. RDIV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.38% for CDC. RDIV is up 4.91% year-to-date (YTD) with +$28M in YTD flows. CDC performs better with 8.39% YTD performance, and -$32M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RDIV and CDC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RDIV vs CDC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RDIV CDC | -4.51%-3.10% | +3.01%+7.19% | +4.91%+8.39% | +19.62%+16.61% | +55.39%+36.26% | +61.90%+36.64% |
| Flows | RDIV CDC | +$567K-$11M | +$36M-$38M | +$28M-$32M | +$41M-$118M | -$244M-$1.26B | +$10M+$29M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RDIV CDC | +14.27%+9.45% | +18.55%+13.70% | +17.32%+11.30% | +17.75%+12.66% |
| Max drawdown | RDIV CDC | -4.62%-3.82% | -13.63%-11.16% | -17.97%-12.62% | -24.77%-21.21% |
| Max drawdown duration | RDIV CDC | 30d11d | 89d90d | 263d254d | 418d947d |
RDIV | CDC | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $54.59 | $71.07 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $54.62 | $70.84 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RDIV | CDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RDIV | CDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $54.59 | $71.07 |
| 1D performance | -0.05% | +0.34% |
| AuM | $931.99 M | $721.37 M |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.38% |
RDIV | CDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | VictoryShares |
| Benchmark | S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index | Nasdaq Victory US Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index |
| N° of holdings | 58 | 98 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 1, 2013 | July 1, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RDIV and CDC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, RDIV is up 4.91% year-to-date (YTD), while CDC has returned 8.39%. That puts CDC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RDIV or CDC?
Year-to-date, the RDIV ETF saw +$28M in flows, compared to -$32M for CDC.
Which ETF is more volatile: RDIV or CDC?
Over the past year, RDIV had a volatility of 18.55%, while CDC experienced 13.7%.
Which ETF is bigger: RDIV or CDC?
As of March 13, 2026, RDIV holds $931.99 M in assets under management (AUM), while CDC manages $721.37 M.
What sectors do the RDIV and CDC ETFs invest in?
RDIV leans toward sectors like Energy, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, CDC focuses on Utilities, Consumer Staples and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the RDIV ETF and CDC ETF?
RDIV top holdings include US, TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP and TARGET. CDC holds in its top three: EVERGY, JOHNSON&JOHNSON and COCA-COLA.
Which ETF is more diversified: RDIV or CDC?
RDIV holds 58 securities with 67.14% of its assets in the top 15. CDC has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 21.36%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.