Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RCTRvsNUKZETF Comparison
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF (NUKZ) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Utilities and Energy. RCTR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.85% for NUKZ. RCTR is up 11.93% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. NUKZ performs worse with 9.54% YTD performance, and +$35M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RCTR and NUKZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RCTR vs NUKZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RCTR NUKZ | -0.27%-1.85% | +10.73%+3.59% | +11.93%+9.54% | n/a+78.08% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | RCTR NUKZ | -+$15M | +$5M+$35M | +$5M+$35M | -+$430M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RCTR NUKZ | +24.83%+25.72% | n/a+28.34% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | RCTR NUKZ | -7.92%-7.59% | n/a-18.76% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RCTR NUKZ | 22d9d | n/a42d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
RCTR | NUKZ | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.62 | $67.56 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $36.12 | $68.84 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RCTR | NUKZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RCTR | NUKZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.62 | $67.56 |
| 1D performance | -1.37% | -1.86% |
| AuM | $21.77 M | $829.04 M |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.85% |
RCTR | NUKZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Exchange Traded Concepts |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index | Range Nuclear Renaissance Index |
| N° of holdings | 42 | 38 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 30, 2025 | January 23, 2024 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RCTR and NUKZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, RCTR is up 11.93% year-to-date (YTD), while NUKZ has returned 9.54%. That puts RCTR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RCTR or NUKZ?
Year-to-date, the RCTR ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$35M for NUKZ.
Which ETF is bigger: RCTR or NUKZ?
As of March 12, 2026, RCTR holds $21.77 M in assets under management (AUM), while NUKZ manages $829.04 M.
What sectors do the RCTR and NUKZ ETFs invest in?
RCTR leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Energy. Meanwhile, NUKZ focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the RCTR ETF and NUKZ ETF?
RCTR top holdings include CAMECO, DOOSAN ENERBILITY and MITSUBISHI HVY. NUKZ holds in its top three: CAMECO, CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP and LOCKHEED MARTIN.
Which ETF is more diversified: RCTR or NUKZ?
RCTR holds 43 securities with 64.25% of its assets in the top 15. NUKZ has 39 securities and a top 15 weight of 54.97%.
Range ETFs Debuts New Lineup of 4 Thematic Energy ETFs on NYSE ARCA
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
