RCTRvsNUKZETF Comparison
VS
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF (NUKZ) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. RCTR's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Energy. In contrast, NUKZ's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Energy. RCTR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.85% for NUKZ. RCTR is down -3.4% year-to-date (YTD) with +$17M in YTD flows. NUKZ performs worse with -8% YTD performance, and -$19M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RCTR and NUKZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RCTR vs NUKZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RCTR NUKZ | -4.02%-5.73% | -5.17%-9.65% | -3.40%-8.00% | -13.75%-18.81% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | RCTR NUKZ | +$2M-$28M | +$5M-$70M | +$17M-$19M | +$26M+$29M | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RCTR NUKZ | +22.50%+24.48% | +24.45%+27.19% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | RCTR NUKZ | -10.39%-14.17% | -19.27%-22.71% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RCTR NUKZ | 36d60d | 162d162d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
RCTR | NUKZ | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $31.28 | $58.12 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $31.42 | $58.53 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RCTR | NUKZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RCTR | NUKZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.28 | $58.12 |
| 1D performance | -0.44% | -0.70% |
| AuM | $29.61 M | $643.07 M |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.85% |
Characteristics
RCTR | NUKZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Exchange Traded Concepts |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index | VettaFi Nuclear Renaissance Index |
| N° of holdings | 43 | 46 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 30, 2025 | January 23, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RCTR
USA
43.54%
Japan
15.22%
Canada
7.83%
Republic of Korea
7.35%
Other
26.06%
NUKZ
USA
50.95%
Canada
11.18%
Republic of Korea
10.22%
Japan
7.56%
Other
20.08%
Sectors
RCTR
Utilities
40.88%
Industrials
38.84%
Energy
10.53%
Other
9.75%
NUKZ
Industrials
50.89%
Utilities
31.93%
Energy
10.35%
Other
6.83%
Advertisement
Diversification
RCTR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
65.07%
NUKZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
53.21%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
RCTR
Hitachi Ltd.
5.43%
Constellation Energy Corp.
5.28%
BHP Group Ltd.
5.13%
Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd.
4.76%
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
4.61%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
4.42%
Cameco Corp.
4.41%
Entergy Corp.
4.19%
Duke Energy Corp.
4.19%
Vistra Corp.
4.12%
The Southern Co.
4.05%
BWX Technologies, Inc.
3.81%
GE Vernova, Inc.
3.64%
Talen Energy Corp.
3.63%
CEZ as
3.40%
NUKZ
Cameco Corp.
8.90%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
3.88%
Endesa SA
3.74%
Samsung C&T Corp.
3.69%
CEZ as
3.66%
GE Vernova, Inc.
3.46%
Dominion Energy, Inc.
3.21%
Fortum Oyj
3.02%
Emerson Electric Co.
2.93%
Jacobs Solutions, Inc.
2.93%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.80%
Talen Energy Corp.
2.79%
Constellation Energy Corp.
2.79%
Duke Energy Corp.
2.78%
Vistra Corp.
2.63%
Frequently asked questions about RCTR and NUKZ
How have the RCTR and NUKZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, RCTR is down -3.4% year-to-date (YTD), while NUKZ has lost -8%. That puts RCTR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RCTR or NUKZ?
Year-to-date, the RCTR ETF saw +$17M in flows, compared to -$19M for NUKZ.
Which ETF is more volatile: RCTR or NUKZ?
Over the past year, RCTR had a volatility of 24.45%, while NUKZ experienced 27.19%.
Which ETF is bigger: RCTR or NUKZ?
As of October 15, 2026, RCTR holds $29.61 M in assets under management (AUM), while NUKZ manages $643.07 M.
What sectors do the RCTR and NUKZ ETFs invest in?
RCTR leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Energy. Meanwhile, NUKZ focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the RCTR ETF and NUKZ ETF?
RCTR top holdings include Hitachi Ltd., Constellation Energy Corp. and BHP Group Ltd.. NUKZ holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc and Endesa SA.
Which ETF is more diversified: RCTR or NUKZ?
RCTR holds 43 securities with 65.07% of its assets in the top 15. NUKZ has 46 securities and a top 15 weight of 53.21%.
Advertisement
Latest news about RCTR & NUKZ
Range ETFs Debuts New Lineup of 4 Thematic Energy ETFs on NYSE ARCA
February 6, 2024
NUKZ
Advertisement
Advertisement
