Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QYLGvsQRMIETF Comparison
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. QYLG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.6% for QRMI. QYLG is up 0.55% year-to-date (YTD) with +$8M in YTD flows. QRMI performs worse with 0.09% YTD performance, and +$798K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QYLG and QRMI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QYLG vs QRMI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QYLG QRMI | -0.20%-0.43% | +0.40%+1.00% | +0.55%+0.09% | +24.86%+5.85% | +83.06%+27.83% | +68.35%n/a |
| Flows | QYLG QRMI | -$264K- | +$20M+$798K | +$8M+$798K | +$38M-$873K | +$62M+$10M | +$137M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QYLG QRMI | +12.72%+6.03% | +19.25%+7.16% | +15.92%+7.10% | +18.60%n/a |
| Max drawdown | QYLG QRMI | -4.33%-2.03% | -13.82%-5.52% | -20.90%-8.42% | -30.00%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QYLG QRMI | 42d55d | 45d188d | 155d279d | 718dn/a |
QYLG | QRMI | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.68 | $15.57 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $27.06 | $15.68 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QYLG | QRMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QYLG | QRMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.68 | $15.57 |
| 1D performance | -1.40% | -0.70% |
| AuM | $137.61 M | $16.48 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.6% |
QYLG | QRMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Benchmark | CBOE Nasdaq-100 Half BuyWrite V2 Index | Nasdaq-100 Monthly Net Credit Collar 95-100 Index |
| N° of holdings | 93 | 93 |
| Asset class | Alternative | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 11, 2013 | August 25, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QYLG and QRMI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, QYLG is up 0.55% year-to-date (YTD), while QRMI has returned 0.09%. That puts QYLG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QYLG or QRMI?
Year-to-date, the QYLG ETF saw +$8M in flows, compared to +$798K for QRMI.
Which ETF is more volatile: QYLG or QRMI?
Over the past year, QYLG had a volatility of 19.25%, while QRMI experienced 7.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: QYLG or QRMI?
As of March 11, 2026, QYLG holds $137.61 M in assets under management (AUM), while QRMI manages $16.48 M.
What sectors do the QYLG and QRMI ETFs invest in?
QYLG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, QRMI focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QYLG ETF and QRMI ETF?
QYLG top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. QRMI holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: QYLG or QRMI?
QYLG holds 99 securities with 59.14% of its assets in the top 15. QRMI has 99 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.74%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
