Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QYLGvsQCLRETF Comparison
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. QYLG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.25% for QCLR. QYLG is down -0.88% year-to-date (YTD) with +$8M in YTD flows. QCLR performs worse with -3.03% YTD performance, and +$860K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QYLG and QCLR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QYLG vs QCLR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QYLG QCLR | +0.27%-1.48% | +0.02%-2.94% | -0.88%-3.03% | +21.72%+13.55% | +80.46%+56.51% | +67.37%n/a |
| Flows | QYLG QCLR | -$264K- | +$20M+$860K | +$8M+$860K | +$38M+$2M | +$62M+$829K | +$137M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QYLG QCLR | +12.88%+11.24% | +19.28%+11.64% | +15.93%+11.90% | +18.61%n/a |
| Max drawdown | QYLG QCLR | -4.33%-5.02% | -13.82%-6.50% | -20.90%-13.20% | -30.00%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QYLG QCLR | 43d43d | 45d45d | 155d127d | 718dn/a |
QYLG | QCLR | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.68 | $27.53 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $27.06 | $27.91 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QYLG | QCLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QYLG | QCLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.68 | $27.53 |
| 1D performance | -1.40% | -1.38% |
| AuM | $135.66 M | $3.86 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.25% |
QYLG | QCLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Benchmark | CBOE Nasdaq-100 Half BuyWrite V2 Index | Nasdaq-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index |
| N° of holdings | 93 | 93 |
| Asset class | Alternative | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 11, 2013 | August 25, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QYLG and QCLR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, QYLG is down -0.88% year-to-date (YTD), while QCLR has lost -3.03%. That puts QYLG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QYLG or QCLR?
Year-to-date, the QYLG ETF saw +$8M in flows, compared to +$860K for QCLR.
Which ETF is more volatile: QYLG or QCLR?
Over the past year, QYLG had a volatility of 19.28%, while QCLR experienced 11.64%.
Which ETF is bigger: QYLG or QCLR?
As of March 12, 2026, QYLG holds $135.66 M in assets under management (AUM), while QCLR manages $3.86 M.
What sectors do the QYLG and QCLR ETFs invest in?
QYLG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, QCLR focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QYLG ETF and QCLR ETF?
QYLG top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. QCLR holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: QYLG or QCLR?
QYLG holds 99 securities with 59.14% of its assets in the top 15. QCLR has 99 securities and a top 15 weight of 58.08%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
