Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QYLGvsQBETF Comparison
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF (QB) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. QYLG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.58% for QB. QYLG is down -0.88% year-to-date (YTD) with +$8M in YTD flows. QB performs better with 2.11% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QYLG and QB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QYLG vs QB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QYLG QB | +0.27%+1.25% | +0.02%+2.90% | -0.88%+2.11% | +21.72%n/a | +80.46%n/a | +67.37%n/a |
| Flows | QYLG QB | -$264K- | +$20M- | +$8M- | +$38M- | +$62M- | +$137M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QYLG QB | +12.88%+5.39% | +19.28%n/a | +15.93%n/a | +18.61%n/a |
| Max drawdown | QYLG QB | -4.33%-1.10% | -13.82%n/a | -20.90%n/a | -30.00%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QYLG QB | 43d10d | 45dn/a | 155dn/a | 718dn/a |
QYLG | QB | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.68 | $43.22 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $27.06 | $43.30 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QYLG | QB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QYLG | QB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.68 | $43.22 |
| 1D performance | -1.40% | -0.18% |
| AuM | $135.66 M | $1.30 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.58% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QYLG and QB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, QYLG is down -0.88% year-to-date (YTD), while QB has returned 2.11%. That puts QB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QYLG or QB?
Year-to-date, the QYLG ETF saw +$8M in flows, compared to - for QB.
Which ETF is bigger: QYLG or QB?
As of March 12, 2026, QYLG holds $135.66 M in assets under management (AUM), while QB manages $1.30 M.
What sectors do the QYLG and QB ETFs invest in?
QYLG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, QB focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QYLG ETF and QB ETF?
QYLG top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. QB holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: QYLG or QB?
QYLG holds 99 securities with 59.14% of its assets in the top 15. QB has 99 securities and a top 15 weight of 58.64%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
