Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QYLGvsPTNQETF Comparison
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) is part of the segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. QYLG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.65% for PTNQ. QYLG is down -0.88% year-to-date (YTD) with +$8M in YTD flows. PTNQ performs worse with -2.89% YTD performance, and -$39M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QYLG and PTNQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QYLG vs PTNQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QYLG PTNQ | +0.27%-0.59% | +0.02%-2.69% | -0.88%-2.89% | +21.72%+7.80% | +80.46%+60.36% | +67.37%+53.96% |
| Flows | QYLG PTNQ | -$264K-$12M | +$20M-$24M | +$8M-$39M | +$38M-$154M | +$62M+$122M | +$137M+$44M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QYLG PTNQ | +12.88%+15.96% | +19.28%+14.72% | +15.93%+12.42% | +18.61%+12.58% |
| Max drawdown | QYLG PTNQ | -4.33%-5.69% | -13.82%-9.84% | -20.90%-14.19% | -30.00%-18.23% |
| Max drawdown duration | QYLG PTNQ | 43d43d | 45d120d | 155d210d | 718d550d |
QYLG | PTNQ | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 7:26 PM | $26.55 | $75.99 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $26.68 | $76.37 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QYLG | PTNQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QYLG | PTNQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.55 | $75.99 |
| 1D performance | -0.49% | -0.49% |
| AuM | $135.66 M | $1.21 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.65% |
QYLG | PTNQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | CBOE Nasdaq-100 Half BuyWrite V2 Index | Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index |
| N° of holdings | 93 | 93 |
| Asset class | Alternative | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 11, 2013 | June 11, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QYLG and PTNQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, QYLG is down -0.88% year-to-date (YTD), while PTNQ has lost -2.89%. That puts QYLG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QYLG or PTNQ?
Year-to-date, the QYLG ETF saw +$8M in flows, compared to -$39M for PTNQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: QYLG or PTNQ?
Over the past year, QYLG had a volatility of 19.28%, while PTNQ experienced 14.72%.
Which ETF is bigger: QYLG or PTNQ?
As of March 12, 2026, QYLG holds $135.66 M in assets under management (AUM), while PTNQ manages $1.21 B.
What sectors do the QYLG and PTNQ ETFs invest in?
QYLG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, PTNQ focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QYLG ETF and PTNQ ETF?
QYLG top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. PTNQ holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: QYLG or PTNQ?
QYLG holds 99 securities with 59.14% of its assets in the top 15. PTNQ has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 58.45%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
