QYLGvsBUFRETF Comparison
VS
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) and FT Vest Fund of Buffer ETF (BUFR) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. QYLG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.95% for BUFR. QYLG is up 16.56% year-to-date (YTD) with +$48M in YTD flows. BUFR performs worse with 10.29% YTD performance, and +$1.67B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QYLG and BUFR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QYLG vs BUFR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QYLG BUFR | -0.99%+0.69% | +6.83%+3.53% | +16.56%+10.29% | +17.21%+11.65% | +86.53%+59.35% | +72.39%+60.65% |
| Flows | QYLG BUFR | +$15M+$181M | +$29M+$557M | +$48M+$1.67B | +$70M+$2.09B | +$73M+$6.26B | +$146M+$7.94B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QYLG BUFR | +14.18%+5.68% | +15.29%+6.54% | +16.61%+8.89% | +18.90%+10.67% |
| Max drawdown | QYLG BUFR | -4.85%-1.14% | -8.28%-4.57% | -20.90%-12.72% | -30.00%-13.60% |
| Max drawdown duration | QYLG BUFR | 21d15d | 75d42d | 155d124d | 718d513d |
Trading data
QYLG | BUFR | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.98 | $37.87 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $29.86 | $37.78 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BUFR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexQYLG | BUFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QYLG | BUFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.98 | $37.87 |
| 1D performance | +0.41% | +0.24% |
| AuM | $190.84 M | $10.99 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.95% |
Characteristics
QYLG | BUFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Global X | First Trust |
| Benchmark | CBOE Nasdaq-100 Half BuyWrite V2 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Alternative | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 11, 2013 | August 10, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QYLG
Data will be available soon
BUFR
Data will be available soon
Sectors
QYLG
Data will be available soon
BUFR
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
QYLG
Data will be available soon
BUFR
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
QYLG
Data will be available soon
BUFR
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about QYLG and BUFR
How have the QYLG and BUFR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 27, 2026, QYLG is up 16.56% year-to-date (YTD), while BUFR has returned 10.29%. That puts QYLG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QYLG or BUFR?
Year-to-date, the QYLG ETF saw +$48M in flows, compared to +$1.67B for BUFR.
Which ETF is more volatile: QYLG or BUFR?
Over the past year, QYLG had a volatility of 15.29%, while BUFR experienced 6.54%.
Which ETF is bigger: QYLG or BUFR?
As of October 27, 2026, QYLG holds $190.84 M in assets under management (AUM), while BUFR manages $10.99 B.
Advertisement
Advertisement
