QWLDvsURTHETF Comparison
ETF 1
QWLD
State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
-0.95%
VS
State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. QWLD's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, URTH's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. QWLD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.24% for URTH. QWLD is up 11.64% year-to-date (YTD) with -$15M in YTD flows. URTH performs better with 11.81% YTD performance, and +$1.18B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QWLD and URTH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QWLD vs URTH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/22/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QWLD URTH | +1.39%-1.72% | +3.73%+1.54% | +11.64%+11.81% | +14.52%+14.88% | +68.48%+83.62% | +61.52%+68.24% |
| Flows | QWLD URTH | -+$601M | -+$662M | -$15M+$1.18B | -$15M+$1.24B | +$29M+$3.59B | +$64M+$4.73B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QWLD URTH | +7.09%+10.88% | +8.29%+13.05% | +9.56%+14.31% | +11.79%+16.26% |
| Max drawdown | QWLD URTH | -3.43%-3.23% | -7.55%-9.09% | -11.20%-16.96% | -22.83%-26.04% |
| Max drawdown duration | QWLD URTH | 70d70d | 73d48d | 84d101d | 709d713d |
Trading data
QWLD | URTH | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $157.45 | $205.21 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $158.55 | $206.17 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QWLD | URTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QWLD | URTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $157.45 | $205.21 |
| 1D performance | -0.70% | -0.47% |
| AuM | $178.51 M | $8.78 B |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.24% |
Characteristics
QWLD | URTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series Index | MSCI World Index |
| N° of holdings | 1194 | 1242 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 4, 2014 | January 10, 2012 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QWLD
USA
63.33%
Japan
7.98%
Other
28.69%
URTH
USA
70.4%
Other
29.6%
Sectors
QWLD
Technology
28.12%
Finance
17.5%
Healthcare
12.94%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.51%
Industrials
8.66%
Other
23.27%
URTH
Technology
35.69%
Finance
18.01%
Industrials
9.57%
Healthcare
9%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.48%
Other
19.26%
Advertisement
Diversification
QWLD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
21.57%
URTH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
30.99%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
QWLD
Microsoft Corp.
3.04%
Apple, Inc.
2.40%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.38%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.72%
Broadcom Inc.
1.65%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.35%
Johnson & Johnson
1.33%
Visa, Inc.
1.22%
ASML Holding NV
1.14%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.05%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
0.95%
Alphabet, Inc.
0.94%
Merck & Co., Inc.
0.84%
Novartis AG
0.79%
The Coca-Cola Co.
0.77%
URTH
NVIDIA Corp.
5.53%
Apple, Inc.
5.07%
Microsoft Corp.
3.90%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.73%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.17%
Broadcom Inc.
1.82%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.71%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.37%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.18%
Tesla, Inc.
1.15%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.03%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.01%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
0.83%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
0.77%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
0.73%
Frequently asked questions about QWLD and URTH
How have the QWLD and URTH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 22, 2026, QWLD is up 11.64% year-to-date (YTD), while URTH has returned 11.81%. That puts URTH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QWLD or URTH?
Year-to-date, the QWLD ETF saw -$15M in flows, compared to +$1.18B for URTH.
Which ETF is more volatile: QWLD or URTH?
Over the past year, QWLD had a volatility of 8.29%, while URTH experienced 13.05%.
Which ETF is bigger: QWLD or URTH?
As of October 22, 2026, QWLD holds $178.51 M in assets under management (AUM), while URTH manages $8.78 B.
What sectors do the QWLD and URTH ETFs invest in?
QWLD leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, URTH focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the QWLD ETF and URTH ETF?
QWLD top holdings include Microsoft Corp., Apple, Inc. and NVIDIA Corp.. URTH holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: QWLD or URTH?
QWLD holds 1205 securities with 21.57% of its assets in the top 15. URTH has 1253 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.99%.
Advertisement
Latest news about QWLD & URTH
Advertisement
