QWLDvsGSWOETF Comparison
ETF 1
QWLD
State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
-0.3%
VS
State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. QWLD's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, GSWO's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. QWLD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.25% for GSWO. QWLD is up 10.98% year-to-date (YTD) with -$15M in YTD flows. GSWO performs better with 12.56% YTD performance, and +$93M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QWLD and GSWO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QWLD vs GSWO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QWLD GSWO | +1.35%-1.30% | +3.78%+2.65% | +10.98%+12.56% | +13.71%+15.04% | +67.47%+72.76% | +60.36%n/a |
| Flows | QWLD GSWO | -- | -+$35M | -$15M+$93M | -$15M+$96M | +$29M+$526M | +$64M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QWLD GSWO | +7.07%+9.64% | +8.31%+11.07% | +9.56%+10.29% | +11.79%n/a |
| Max drawdown | QWLD GSWO | -3.43%-2.64% | -7.55%-8.78% | -11.20%-9.99% | -22.83%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QWLD GSWO | 71d71d | 73d48d | 84d71d | 709dn/a |
Trading data
QWLD | GSWO | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $157.46 | $64.21 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $158.55 | $64.49 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QWLD | GSWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QWLD | GSWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $157.46 | $64.21 |
| 1D performance | -0.69% | -0.43% |
| AuM | $177.44 M | $1.77 B |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.25% |
Characteristics
QWLD | GSWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series Index | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 1194 | 720 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 4, 2014 | March 15, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QWLD
USA
63.33%
Japan
7.98%
Other
28.69%
GSWO
USA
65.61%
Japan
8.4%
Other
25.99%
Sectors
QWLD
Technology
28.12%
Finance
17.5%
Healthcare
12.94%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.51%
Industrials
8.66%
Other
23.27%
GSWO
Technology
36.61%
Finance
16.57%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.17%
Healthcare
9.42%
Industrials
8.33%
Other
18.9%
Advertisement
Diversification
QWLD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
21.57%
GSWO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
31.47%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
QWLD
Microsoft Corp.
3.04%
Apple, Inc.
2.40%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.38%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.72%
Broadcom Inc.
1.65%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.35%
Johnson & Johnson
1.33%
Visa, Inc.
1.22%
ASML Holding NV
1.14%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.05%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
0.95%
Alphabet, Inc.
0.94%
Merck & Co., Inc.
0.84%
Novartis AG
0.79%
The Coca-Cola Co.
0.77%
GSWO
NVIDIA Corp.
5.49%
Apple, Inc.
5.00%
Microsoft Corp.
3.94%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.75%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.21%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.91%
Broadcom Inc.
1.80%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.39%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.26%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.16%
Tesla, Inc.
1.13%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.05%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
0.86%
ASML Holding NV
0.77%
Visa, Inc.
0.75%
Frequently asked questions about QWLD and GSWO
How have the QWLD and GSWO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, QWLD is up 10.98% year-to-date (YTD), while GSWO has returned 12.56%. That puts GSWO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QWLD or GSWO?
Year-to-date, the QWLD ETF saw -$15M in flows, compared to +$93M for GSWO.
Which ETF is more volatile: QWLD or GSWO?
Over the past year, QWLD had a volatility of 8.31%, while GSWO experienced 11.07%.
Which ETF is bigger: QWLD or GSWO?
As of October 23, 2026, QWLD holds $177.44 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSWO manages $1.77 B.
What sectors do the QWLD and GSWO ETFs invest in?
QWLD leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, GSWO focuses on Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the QWLD ETF and GSWO ETF?
QWLD top holdings include Microsoft Corp., Apple, Inc. and NVIDIA Corp.. GSWO holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: QWLD or GSWO?
QWLD holds 1205 securities with 21.57% of its assets in the top 15. GSWO has 725 securities and a top 15 weight of 31.47%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
