Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QWLDvsGSWOETF Comparison
SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. QWLD's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. In contrast, GSWO's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Staples. QWLD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.25% for GSWO. QWLD is up 0.62% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4M in YTD flows. GSWO performs better with 1% YTD performance, and +$15M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QWLD and GSWO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QWLD vs GSWO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QWLD GSWO | -3.50%-2.97% | +0.68%+1.11% | +0.62%+1.00% | +16.93%+16.69% | +61.89%+62.78% | +63.50%n/a |
| Flows | QWLD GSWO | -- | +$4M-$25M | +$4M+$15M | +$7M+$224M | +$58M+$522M | +$82M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QWLD GSWO | +8.03%+9.33% | +11.15%+11.29% | +9.70%+9.49% | +11.81%n/a |
| Max drawdown | QWLD GSWO | -4.96%-3.38% | -10.12%-9.23% | -11.20%-9.99% | -22.83%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QWLD GSWO | 12d14d | 37d27d | 84d71d | 709dn/a |
QWLD | GSWO | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $144.07 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $144.87 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QWLD | GSWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QWLD | GSWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $144.07 | – |
| 1D performance | -0.55% | – |
| AuM | $180.34 M | $1.53 B |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.25% |
QWLD | GSWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | SPDR | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series Index | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 1209 | 426 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 4, 2014 | March 15, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QWLD and GSWO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, QWLD is up 0.62% year-to-date (YTD), while GSWO has returned 1%. That puts GSWO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QWLD or GSWO?
Year-to-date, the QWLD ETF saw +$4M in flows, compared to +$15M for GSWO.
Which ETF is more volatile: QWLD or GSWO?
Over the past year, QWLD had a volatility of 11.15%, while GSWO experienced 11.29%.
Which ETF is bigger: QWLD or GSWO?
As of March 13, 2026, QWLD holds $180.34 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSWO manages $1.53 B.
What sectors do the QWLD and GSWO ETFs invest in?
QWLD leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, GSWO focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Staples.
What are the top holdings of the QWLD ETF and GSWO ETF?
QWLD top holdings include MICROSOFT-T, META PLATFORMS and APPLE. GSWO holds in its top three: APPLE, NVIDIA and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: QWLD or GSWO?
QWLD holds 1285 securities with 20.89% of its assets in the top 15. GSWO has 436 securities and a top 15 weight of 22.19%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
