QWLDvsESGGETF Comparison
ETF 1
QWLD
State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
-0.3%
VS
State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) belongs to the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. Northern Trust STOXX Global ESG Select ETF (ESGG) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. QWLD is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.45% for ESGG. QWLD is up 10.98% year-to-date (YTD) with -$15M in YTD flows. ESGG performs better with 16.22% YTD performance, and +$395K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QWLD and ESGG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QWLD vs ESGG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QWLD ESGG | +1.35%-1.37% | +3.78%+2.24% | +10.98%+16.22% | +13.71%+19.89% | +67.47%+86.88% | +60.36%+74.51% |
| Flows | QWLD ESGG | -+$6M | -+$6M | -$15M+$395K | -$15M+$337K | +$29M-$109M | +$64M-$121M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QWLD ESGG | +7.07%+10.23% | +8.31%+11.94% | +9.56%+12.30% | +11.79%+14.28% |
| Max drawdown | QWLD ESGG | -3.43%-3.12% | -7.55%-8.90% | -11.20%-15.94% | -22.83%-27.31% |
| Max drawdown duration | QWLD ESGG | 71d71d | 73d64d | 84d101d | 709d709d |
Trading data
QWLD | ESGG | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $157.46 | $236.28 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $158.55 | $237.04 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QWLD | ESGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QWLD | ESGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $157.46 | $236.28 |
| 1D performance | -0.69% | -0.32% |
| AuM | $177.44 M | $118.17 M |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.45% |
Characteristics
QWLD | ESGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | Northern Trust |
| Benchmark | MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series Index | STOXX Global ESG Impact Index |
| N° of holdings | 1194 | 680 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 4, 2014 | July 13, 2016 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QWLD
USA
63.33%
Japan
7.98%
Other
28.69%
ESGG
USA
65.66%
Other
34.34%
Sectors
QWLD
Technology
28.12%
Finance
17.5%
Healthcare
12.94%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.51%
Industrials
8.66%
Other
23.27%
ESGG
Technology
37.65%
Finance
20.75%
Healthcare
13.52%
Other
28.09%
Advertisement
Diversification
QWLD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
21.57%
ESGG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
47.42%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
QWLD
Microsoft Corp.
3.04%
Apple, Inc.
2.40%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.38%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.72%
Broadcom Inc.
1.65%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.35%
Johnson & Johnson
1.33%
Visa, Inc.
1.22%
ASML Holding NV
1.14%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.05%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
0.95%
Alphabet, Inc.
0.94%
Merck & Co., Inc.
0.84%
Novartis AG
0.79%
The Coca-Cola Co.
0.77%
ESGG
Microsoft Corp.
6.04%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
5.05%
Apple, Inc.
4.97%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.85%
Broadcom Inc.
4.39%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.29%
Eli Lilly & Co.
3.49%
Johnson & Johnson
3.38%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
2.84%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.86%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.32%
Merck & Co., Inc.
1.30%
ASML Holding NV
1.25%
Walmart, Inc.
1.22%
Wells Fargo & Co.
1.18%
Frequently asked questions about QWLD and ESGG
How have the QWLD and ESGG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, QWLD is up 10.98% year-to-date (YTD), while ESGG has returned 16.22%. That puts ESGG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QWLD or ESGG?
Year-to-date, the QWLD ETF saw -$15M in flows, compared to +$395K for ESGG.
Which ETF is more volatile: QWLD or ESGG?
Over the past year, QWLD had a volatility of 8.31%, while ESGG experienced 11.94%.
Which ETF is bigger: QWLD or ESGG?
As of October 23, 2026, QWLD holds $177.44 M in assets under management (AUM), while ESGG manages $118.17 M.
What sectors do the QWLD and ESGG ETFs invest in?
QWLD leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, ESGG focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the QWLD ETF and ESGG ETF?
QWLD top holdings include Microsoft Corp., Apple, Inc. and NVIDIA Corp.. ESGG holds in its top three: Microsoft Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Apple, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QWLD or ESGG?
QWLD holds 1205 securities with 21.57% of its assets in the top 15. ESGG has 680 securities and a top 15 weight of 47.42%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
