QWLDvsACWIETF Comparison
ETF 1
QWLD
State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
+0.12%
VS
State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) belongs to the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. QWLD's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, ACWI's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. QWLD is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.32% for ACWI. QWLD is up 7.54% year-to-date (YTD) with -$15M in YTD flows. ACWI performs better with 9.76% YTD performance, and +$4.31B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QWLD and ACWI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QWLD vs ACWI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QWLD ACWI | +2.30%+0.09% | +3.42%+3.18% | +7.54%+9.76% | +14.17%+18.99% | +51.94%+65.01% | +58.66%+64.60% |
| Flows | QWLD ACWI | --$181M | -$19M+$163M | -$15M+$4.31B | -$15M+$5.10B | +$32M+$3.83B | +$64M+$5.73B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QWLD ACWI | +7.54%+15.06% | +8.35%+13.60% | +9.73%+14.31% | +11.83%+15.95% |
| Max drawdown | QWLD ACWI | -2.03%-4.86% | -7.55%-9.61% | -11.20%-16.56% | -22.83%-26.35% |
| Max drawdown duration | QWLD ACWI | 16d52d | 73d48d | 84d87d | 709d750d |
Trading data
QWLD | ACWI | |
Last sale 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $153.81 | $154.61 |
| Previous close 07/24/2026 | $152.84 | $154.30 |
| Consolidated volume 07/24/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QWLD | ACWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QWLD | ACWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $153.81 | $154.61 |
| 1D performance | +0.63% | +0.20% |
| AuM | $171.95 M | $32.06 B |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.32% |
Characteristics
QWLD | ACWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | State Street Investment Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series Index | MSCI ACWI Index |
| N° of holdings | 1226 | 2163 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 4, 2014 | March 26, 2008 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QWLD
USA
64.45%
Japan
7.54%
Other
28.01%
ACWI
USA
61.9%
Other
38.1%
Sectors
QWLD
Technology
28.77%
Finance
16.9%
Healthcare
12.95%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.69%
Industrials
8.87%
Other
22.83%
ACWI
Technology
37.6%
Finance
17.75%
Industrials
9.54%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.07%
Healthcare
8.03%
Other
19.01%
Advertisement
Diversification
QWLD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
21.76%
ACWI
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.15%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
QWLD
Microsoft Corp.
2.34%
Apple, Inc.
2.29%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.21%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.79%
Broadcom Inc.
1.74%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.45%
ASML Holding NV
1.38%
Johnson & Johnson
1.36%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.17%
Visa, Inc.
1.15%
Applied Materials, Inc.
1.09%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.06%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.04%
Lam Research Corp.
0.87%
Novartis AG
0.85%
ACWI
NVIDIA Corp.
4.54%
Apple, Inc.
4.17%
Microsoft Corp.
2.58%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.27%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.04%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.83%
Broadcom Inc.
1.67%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.60%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.28%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.21%
Tesla, Inc.
1.16%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
0.99%
Eli Lilly & Co.
0.95%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
0.93%
SK hynix, Inc.
0.93%
Frequently asked questions about QWLD and ACWI
How have the QWLD and ACWI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, QWLD is up 7.54% year-to-date (YTD), while ACWI has returned 9.76%. That puts ACWI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QWLD or ACWI?
Year-to-date, the QWLD ETF saw -$15M in flows, compared to +$4.31B for ACWI.
Which ETF is more volatile: QWLD or ACWI?
Over the past year, QWLD had a volatility of 8.35%, while ACWI experienced 13.6%.
Which ETF is bigger: QWLD or ACWI?
As of July 24, 2026, QWLD holds $171.95 M in assets under management (AUM), while ACWI manages $32.06 B.
What sectors do the QWLD and ACWI ETFs invest in?
QWLD leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, ACWI focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the QWLD ETF and ACWI ETF?
QWLD top holdings include Microsoft Corp., Apple, Inc. and NVIDIA Corp.. ACWI holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: QWLD or ACWI?
QWLD holds 1241 securities with 21.76% of its assets in the top 15. ACWI has 2224 securities and a top 15 weight of 28.15%.
Advertisement
Latest news about QWLD & ACWI
Advertisement
