QVMMvsXJHETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) is part of the US Mid Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Industrials and Technology. QVMM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.12% for XJH. QVMM is up 15.38% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. XJH performs worse with 14.76% YTD performance, and +$35M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QVMM and XJH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QVMM vs XJH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/31/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QVMM XJH | -1.18%-1.50% | +3.49%+4.32% | +15.38%+14.76% | +22.56%+22.30% | +46.44%+43.06% | +51.16%+47.00% |
| Flows | QVMM XJH | -$353K+$8M | -$353K+$30M | +$2M+$35M | -$1M+$61M | +$36M+$216M | +$98M+$292M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QVMM XJH | +14.84%+15.11% | +15.46%+16.15% | +17.77%+18.17% | +19.36%+19.78% |
| Max drawdown | QVMM XJH | -4.70%-4.42% | -8.41%-9.65% | -23.85%-24.38% | -23.85%-24.99% |
| Max drawdown duration | QVMM XJH | 26d16d | 42d53d | 379d379d | 379d815d |
Trading data
QVMM | XJH | |
Last sale 7/31/2026 at 3:34 PM | $35.35 | $51.48 |
| Previous close 07/31/2026 | $35.32 | $51.05 |
| Consolidated volume 07/31/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QVMM | XJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/31/2026 at 3:34 PM
Live
Closed
QVMM | XJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.35 | $51.48 |
| 1D performance | +0.08% | +0.84% |
| AuM | $427.92 M | $417.81 M |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.12% |
Characteristics
QVMM | XJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | iShares |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-factor Index | S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index |
| N° of holdings | 360 | 359 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 30, 2021 | September 22, 2020 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QVMM
USA
96.32%
Other
3.68%
XJH
USA
95.38%
Other
4.62%
Sectors
QVMM
Finance
22.85%
Industrials
20.27%
Technology
13.76%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.98%
Healthcare
7.49%
Other
24.64%
XJH
Finance
23.46%
Industrials
19.21%
Technology
15.87%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.35%
Healthcare
9.47%
Other
21.64%
Advertisement
Diversification
QVMM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
11.99%
XJH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
12.56%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
QVMM
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
0.87%
nVent Electric Plc
0.85%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
0.84%
MasTec, Inc.
0.83%
Illumina, Inc.
0.82%
MKS, Inc.
0.81%
Twilio, Inc.
0.81%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.80%
Entegris, Inc.
0.80%
Everpure, Inc.
0.79%
ATI, Inc.
0.78%
TechnipFMC plc
0.77%
Woodward, Inc.
0.74%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
0.74%
United Therapeutics Corp.
0.73%
XJH
Twilio, Inc.
0.97%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.95%
MKS, Inc.
0.93%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
0.87%
nVent Electric Plc
0.85%
Entegris, Inc.
0.85%
ATI, Inc.
0.83%
Illumina, Inc.
0.82%
TechnipFMC plc
0.82%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
0.80%
MasTec, Inc.
0.79%
Woodward, Inc.
0.78%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
0.77%
Everpure, Inc.
0.77%
XPO, Inc.
0.75%
Frequently asked questions about QVMM and XJH
How have the QVMM and XJH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 31, 2026, QVMM is up 15.38% year-to-date (YTD), while XJH has returned 14.76%. That puts QVMM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QVMM or XJH?
Year-to-date, the QVMM ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$35M for XJH.
Which ETF is more volatile: QVMM or XJH?
Over the past year, QVMM had a volatility of 15.46%, while XJH experienced 16.15%.
Which ETF is bigger: QVMM or XJH?
As of July 31, 2026, QVMM holds $427.92 M in assets under management (AUM), while XJH manages $417.81 M.
What sectors do the QVMM and XJH ETFs invest in?
QVMM leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, XJH focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the QVMM ETF and XJH ETF?
QVMM top holdings include Curtiss-Wright Corp., nVent Electric Plc and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.. XJH holds in its top three: Twilio, Inc., Carpenter Technology Corp. and MKS, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QVMM or XJH?
QVMM holds 360 securities with 11.99% of its assets in the top 15. XJH has 359 securities and a top 15 weight of 12.56%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
