QVMMvsPAMCETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMM) and Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. QVMM's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. In contrast, PAMC's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. QVMM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.6% for PAMC. QVMM is up 15.38% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. PAMC performs better with 15.8% YTD performance, and -$11M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QVMM and PAMC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QVMM vs PAMC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/31/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QVMM PAMC | -1.18%-2.94% | +3.49%+2.53% | +15.38%+15.80% | +22.56%+22.45% | +46.44%+52.90% | +51.16%+58.27% |
| Flows | QVMM PAMC | -$353K- | -$353K-$11M | +$2M-$11M | -$1M-$20M | +$36M-$947K | +$98M-$5M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QVMM PAMC | +14.84%+17.83% | +15.46%+18.98% | +17.77%+18.57% | +19.36%+20.35% |
| Max drawdown | QVMM PAMC | -4.70%-4.82% | -8.41%-10.32% | -23.85%-25.78% | -23.85%-26.73% |
| Max drawdown duration | QVMM PAMC | 26d16d | 42d89d | 379d422d | 379d801d |
Trading data
QVMM | PAMC | |
Last sale 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.35 | $54.38 |
| Previous close 07/31/2026 | $35.32 | $53.74 |
| Consolidated volume 07/31/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QVMM | PAMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QVMM | PAMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.35 | $54.38 |
| 1D performance | +0.08% | +1.20% |
| AuM | $427.92 M | $53.79 M |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
QVMM | PAMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-factor Index | Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index |
| N° of holdings | 360 | 151 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 30, 2021 | June 24, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QVMM
USA
96.32%
Other
3.68%
PAMC
USA
93.62%
Other
6.38%
Sectors
QVMM
Finance
22.85%
Industrials
20.27%
Technology
13.76%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.98%
Healthcare
7.49%
Other
24.64%
PAMC
Finance
25.1%
Industrials
20.6%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.49%
Technology
10.9%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.26%
Energy
7.78%
Other
14.87%
Advertisement
Diversification
QVMM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
11.99%
PAMC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
24.1%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
QVMM
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
0.87%
nVent Electric Plc
0.85%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
0.84%
MasTec, Inc.
0.83%
Illumina, Inc.
0.82%
MKS, Inc.
0.81%
Twilio, Inc.
0.81%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.80%
Entegris, Inc.
0.80%
Everpure, Inc.
0.79%
ATI, Inc.
0.78%
TechnipFMC plc
0.77%
Woodward, Inc.
0.74%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
0.74%
United Therapeutics Corp.
0.73%
PAMC
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
2.16%
Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
2.08%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
1.79%
ATI, Inc.
1.78%
TTM Technologies, Inc.
1.68%
TD SYNNEX Corp.
1.66%
Woodward, Inc.
1.64%
TechnipFMC plc
1.63%
HF Sinclair Corp.
1.55%
Reinsurance Group of America, Inc.
1.42%
nVent Electric Plc
1.41%
MKS, Inc.
1.40%
Performance Food Group Co.
1.33%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
1.29%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
1.28%
Frequently asked questions about QVMM and PAMC
How have the QVMM and PAMC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 31, 2026, QVMM is up 15.38% year-to-date (YTD), while PAMC has returned 15.8%. That puts PAMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QVMM or PAMC?
Year-to-date, the QVMM ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to -$11M for PAMC.
Which ETF is more volatile: QVMM or PAMC?
Over the past year, QVMM had a volatility of 15.46%, while PAMC experienced 18.98%.
Which ETF is bigger: QVMM or PAMC?
As of July 31, 2026, QVMM holds $427.92 M in assets under management (AUM), while PAMC manages $53.79 M.
What sectors do the QVMM and PAMC ETFs invest in?
QVMM leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, PAMC focuses on Finance, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the QVMM ETF and PAMC ETF?
QVMM top holdings include Curtiss-Wright Corp., nVent Electric Plc and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.. PAMC holds in its top three: Curtiss-Wright Corp., Annaly Capital Management, Inc. and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QVMM or PAMC?
QVMM holds 360 securities with 11.99% of its assets in the top 15. PAMC has 151 securities and a top 15 weight of 24.1%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
