QVMLvsLFEQETF Comparison
VS
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) is part of the Multi-Asset: Other segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. QVML is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.11%, versus 0.83% for LFEQ. QVML is up 13.23% year-to-date (YTD) with +$146M in YTD flows. LFEQ performs worse with 11.98% YTD performance, and -$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QVML and LFEQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QVML vs LFEQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QVML LFEQ | -1.28%-1.34% | +3.36%+3.03% | +13.23%+11.98% | +17.78%+16.35% | +80.11%+60.38% | +86.93%+54.57% |
| Flows | QVML LFEQ | +$284M-$2M | +$311M-$3M | +$146M-$3M | +$177M-$4M | +$333M-$10M | +$364M-$21M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QVML LFEQ | +11.43%+11.46% | +12.60%+12.79% | +14.98%+14.44% | +16.66%+14.48% |
| Max drawdown | QVML LFEQ | -3.39%-3.36% | -8.73%-8.98% | -18.54%-18.71% | -23.56%-25.50% |
| Max drawdown duration | QVML LFEQ | 16d19d | 70d77d | 127d189d | 707d787d |
Trading data
QVML | LFEQ | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.35 | $60.71 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $45.26 | $60.66 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QVML | LFEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QVML | LFEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.35 | $60.71 |
| 1D performance | +0.20% | +0.07% |
| AuM | $1.82 B | $27.28 M |
| E/R | 0.11% | 0.83% |
Characteristics
QVML | LFEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | VanEck |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-factor Index | Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index |
| N° of holdings | 449 | 500 |
| Asset class | Equities | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 30, 2021 | April 10, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QVML
USA
97.36%
Other
2.64%
LFEQ
USA
97.42%
Other
2.58%
Sectors
QVML
Technology
47.46%
Finance
14.18%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.24%
Healthcare
8.7%
Industrials
7.84%
Other
12.58%
LFEQ
Technology
44.7%
Finance
13.84%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.41%
Healthcare
8.88%
Industrials
7.86%
Other
15.32%
Advertisement
Diversification
QVML
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
48.62%
LFEQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
44.02%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
QVML
Apple, Inc.
8.80%
NVIDIA Corp.
8.05%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.25%
Microsoft Corp.
5.02%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.17%
Broadcom Inc.
3.49%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.35%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.54%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.53%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.50%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.48%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.32%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.06%
Visa, Inc.
1.05%
Johnson & Johnson
1.01%
LFEQ
NVIDIA Corp.
7.55%
Apple, Inc.
7.04%
Microsoft Corp.
5.36%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.13%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.24%
Broadcom Inc.
2.86%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.62%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.90%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.46%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.46%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.44%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.41%
Tesla, Inc.
1.36%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.21%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.00%
Frequently asked questions about QVML and LFEQ
How have the QVML and LFEQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 17, 2026, QVML is up 13.23% year-to-date (YTD), while LFEQ has returned 11.98%. That puts QVML better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QVML or LFEQ?
Year-to-date, the QVML ETF saw +$146M in flows, compared to -$3M for LFEQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: QVML or LFEQ?
Over the past year, QVML had a volatility of 12.6%, while LFEQ experienced 12.79%.
Which ETF is bigger: QVML or LFEQ?
As of September 17, 2026, QVML holds $1.82 B in assets under management (AUM), while LFEQ manages $27.28 M.
What sectors do the QVML and LFEQ ETFs invest in?
QVML leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, LFEQ focuses on Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the QVML ETF and LFEQ ETF?
QVML top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Alphabet, Inc.. LFEQ holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: QVML or LFEQ?
QVML holds 449 securities with 48.62% of its assets in the top 15. LFEQ has 503 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.02%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
