Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QUSvsXMAGETF Comparison
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) is part of the US Large Cap segment. QUS's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. In contrast, XMAG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. QUS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.35% for XMAG. QUS is up 1.14% year-to-date (YTD) with -$20M in YTD flows. XMAG performs better with 1.45% YTD performance, and +$35M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QUS and XMAG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QUS vs XMAG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QUS XMAG | -2.05%-2.38% | +0.77%+0.04% | +1.14%+1.45% | +15.71%+18.19% | +68.94%n/a | +73.66%n/a |
| Flows | QUS XMAG | -$30M+$10M | -$23M+$62M | -$20M+$35M | -$83M+$107M | +$28M- | +$63M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QUS XMAG | +8.64%+11.10% | +14.32%+16.25% | +11.91%n/a | +14.39%n/a |
| Max drawdown | QUS XMAG | -2.59%-2.67% | -10.91%-12.39% | -13.88%n/a | -22.27%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QUS XMAG | 10d10d | 46d46d | 128dn/a | 701dn/a |
QUS | XMAG | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $176.09 | $22.71 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $176.60 | $22.80 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QUS | XMAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QUS | XMAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $176.09 | $22.71 |
| 1D performance | -0.29% | -0.39% |
| AuM | $1.53 B | $138.72 M |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.35% |
QUS | XMAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | SPDR | Defiance ETFs |
| Benchmark | MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index | BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index |
| N° of holdings | 511 | 466 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 15, 2015 | October 21, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QUS and XMAG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, QUS is up 1.14% year-to-date (YTD), while XMAG has returned 1.45%. That puts XMAG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QUS or XMAG?
Year-to-date, the QUS ETF saw -$20M in flows, compared to +$35M for XMAG.
Which ETF is more volatile: QUS or XMAG?
Over the past year, QUS had a volatility of 14.32%, while XMAG experienced 16.25%.
Which ETF is bigger: QUS or XMAG?
As of March 11, 2026, QUS holds $1.53 B in assets under management (AUM), while XMAG manages $138.72 M.
What sectors do the QUS and XMAG ETFs invest in?
QUS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, XMAG focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the QUS ETF and XMAG ETF?
QUS top holdings include APPLE, MICROSOFT-T and META PLATFORMS. XMAG holds in its top three: BROADCOM LIMITED, LILLY and JPMORGAN CHASE.
Which ETF is more diversified: QUS or XMAG?
QUS holds 542 securities with 28.04% of its assets in the top 15. XMAG has 490 securities and a top 15 weight of 22.56%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
