Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QTRvsQRMIETF Comparison
Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. QTR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.25%, versus 0.6% for QRMI. QTR is down -3.45% year-to-date (YTD) with +$307K in YTD flows. QRMI performs better with -0.67% YTD performance, and +$798K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QTR and QRMI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QTR vs QRMI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QTR QRMI | -1.31%-0.00% | -3.47%+0.31% | -3.45%-0.67% | +18.47%+5.00% | +81.27%+26.86% | n/an/a |
| Flows | QTR QRMI | -- | +$307K+$798K | +$307K+$798K | -$226K-$873K | +$793K+$10M | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QTR QRMI | +14.06%+6.23% | +16.62%+7.21% | +16.33%+7.11% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | QTR QRMI | -5.84%-2.03% | -9.86%-5.52% | -18.55%-8.42% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QTR QRMI | 43d56d | 45d188d | 198d279d | n/an/a |
QTR | QRMI | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.34 | $15.57 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $29.83 | $15.68 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QTR | QRMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QTR | QRMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.34 | $15.57 |
| 1D performance | -1.63% | -0.70% |
| AuM | $2.93 M | $16.35 M |
| E/R | 0.25% | 0.6% |
QTR | QRMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index | Nasdaq-100 Monthly Net Credit Collar 95-100 Index |
| N° of holdings | 93 | 93 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 25, 2021 | August 25, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QTR and QRMI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, QTR is down -3.45% year-to-date (YTD), while QRMI has lost -0.67%. That puts QRMI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QTR or QRMI?
Year-to-date, the QTR ETF saw +$307K in flows, compared to +$798K for QRMI.
Which ETF is more volatile: QTR or QRMI?
Over the past year, QTR had a volatility of 16.62%, while QRMI experienced 7.21%.
Which ETF is bigger: QTR or QRMI?
As of March 12, 2026, QTR holds $2.93 M in assets under management (AUM), while QRMI manages $16.35 M.
What sectors do the QTR and QRMI ETFs invest in?
QTR leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, QRMI focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QTR ETF and QRMI ETF?
QTR top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. QRMI holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: QTR or QRMI?
QTR holds 99 securities with 58.05% of its assets in the top 15. QRMI has 99 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.74%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
