Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QTOPvsLRNDETF Comparison
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. QTOP's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, LRND's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. QTOP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.15% for LRND. QTOP is down -1.56% year-to-date (YTD) with -$44M in YTD flows. LRND performs worse with -3.11% YTD performance, and +$102M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QTOP and LRND below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QTOP vs LRND performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QTOP LRND | -0.59%-2.30% | -2.85%-3.89% | -1.56%-3.11% | +32.33%+21.00% | n/a+92.12% | n/an/a |
| Flows | QTOP LRND | -$43M+$54M | -$36M+$159M | -$44M+$102M | +$102M+$160M | -+$161M | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QTOP LRND | +18.47%+15.14% | +23.78%+20.85% | n/a+17.15% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | QTOP LRND | -6.41%-5.64% | -15.65%-16.04% | n/a-20.97% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QTOP LRND | 41d40d | 45d49d | n/a126d | n/an/a |
QTOP | LRND | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $31.53 | $39.38 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $31.44 | $39.42 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QTOP | LRND | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QTOP | LRND | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.53 | $39.38 |
| 1D performance | +0.28% | -0.10% |
| AuM | $227.78 M | $165.82 M |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.15% |
QTOP | LRND | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | New York Life Investments |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index | NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders Index |
| N° of holdings | 29 | 93 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 23, 2024 | February 8, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QTOP and LRND ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, QTOP is down -1.56% year-to-date (YTD), while LRND has lost -3.11%. That puts QTOP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QTOP or LRND?
Year-to-date, the QTOP ETF saw -$44M in flows, compared to +$102M for LRND.
Which ETF is more volatile: QTOP or LRND?
Over the past year, QTOP had a volatility of 23.78%, while LRND experienced 20.85%.
Which ETF is bigger: QTOP or LRND?
As of March 10, 2026, QTOP holds $227.78 M in assets under management (AUM), while LRND manages $165.82 M.
What sectors do the QTOP and LRND ETFs invest in?
QTOP leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, LRND focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the QTOP ETF and LRND ETF?
QTOP top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. LRND holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: QTOP or LRND?
QTOP holds 32 securities with 76.3% of its assets in the top 15. LRND has 95 securities and a top 15 weight of 75.02%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
