QSMLvsSCDSETF Comparison
VS
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) is part of the US Small Cap segment. QSML's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Healthcare. In contrast, SCDS's top sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. QSML is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.38%, versus 0.4% for SCDS. QSML is up 20.64% year-to-date (YTD) with +$15M in YTD flows. SCDS performs better with 21.64% YTD performance, and +$752K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QSML and SCDS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QSML vs SCDS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QSML SCDS | +5.93%-0.50% | +0.98%-4.37% | +20.64%+21.64% | +24.14%+23.33% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | QSML SCDS | +$14M- | +$15M+$759K | +$15M+$752K | +$15M+$752K | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QSML SCDS | +13.82%+12.34% | +16.50%+17.20% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | QSML SCDS | -8.05%-9.60% | -10.76%-9.60% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QSML SCDS | 67d78d | 85d78d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
QSML | SCDS | |
Last sale 11/3/2026 at 2:30 PM | $34.58 | $72.71 |
| Previous close 11/02/2026 | $34.71 | $72.46 |
| Consolidated volume 11/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SCDS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexQSML | SCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/3/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
QSML | SCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.58 | $72.71 |
| 1D performance | -0.37% | +0.33% |
| AuM | $26.90 M | $9.42 M |
| E/R | 0.38% | 0.4% |
Characteristics
QSML | SCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | WisdomTree | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth SmallCap Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 375 | 271 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 25, 2024 | August 7, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QSML
USA
96.52%
Other
3.48%
SCDS
USA
95.31%
Other
4.69%
Sectors
QSML
Finance
19.25%
Technology
17.99%
Healthcare
14.16%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.47%
Industrials
9.72%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.49%
Other
19.92%
SCDS
Finance
25.77%
Healthcare
17.26%
Technology
15.41%
Industrials
9.94%
Other
31.63%
Advertisement
Diversification
QSML
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
9.67%
SCDS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
13.62%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
QSML
TG Therapeutics, Inc.
0.80%
Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.
0.69%
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.
0.67%
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
0.66%
MarketAxess Holdings, Inc.
0.66%
GitLab, Inc.
0.64%
Zeta Global Holdings Corp.
0.64%
EPAM Systems, Inc.
0.63%
Essent Group Ltd.
0.63%
Ligand Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
0.62%
Impinj, Inc.
0.61%
Lyft, Inc.
0.61%
Xometry, Inc.
0.60%
Commvault Systems, Inc.
0.60%
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
0.59%
SCDS
Twist Bioscience Corp.
1.33%
The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc.
1.18%
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
1.06%
Moog, Inc.
1.01%
WSFS Financial Corp.
0.97%
AZZ, Inc.
0.92%
Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc.
0.91%
Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.
0.91%
First Financial Bancorp (Ohio)
0.81%
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.
0.79%
Knowles Corp.
0.77%
Rush Enterprises, Inc.
0.75%
Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc.
0.75%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
0.74%
SM Energy Co.
0.73%
Frequently asked questions about QSML and SCDS
How have the QSML and SCDS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 2, 2026, QSML is up 20.64% year-to-date (YTD), while SCDS has returned 21.64%. That puts SCDS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QSML or SCDS?
Year-to-date, the QSML ETF saw +$15M in flows, compared to +$752K for SCDS.
Which ETF is more volatile: QSML or SCDS?
Over the past year, QSML had a volatility of 16.5%, while SCDS experienced 17.2%.
Which ETF is bigger: QSML or SCDS?
As of November 2, 2026, QSML holds $26.90 M in assets under management (AUM), while SCDS manages $9.42 M.
What sectors do the QSML and SCDS ETFs invest in?
QSML leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, SCDS focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the QSML ETF and SCDS ETF?
QSML top holdings include TG Therapeutics, Inc., Victory Capital Holdings, Inc. and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.. SCDS holds in its top three: Twist Bioscience Corp., The Chefs' Warehouse, Inc. and Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QSML or SCDS?
QSML holds 375 securities with 9.67% of its assets in the top 15. SCDS has 271 securities and a top 15 weight of 13.62%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
