QSMLvsPRFZETF Comparison
VS
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) and Invesco RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. QSML's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Healthcare. In contrast, PRFZ's top sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. QSML is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.38%, versus 0.36% for PRFZ. QSML is up 14.35% year-to-date (YTD) with +$827K in YTD flows. PRFZ performs better with 15.96% YTD performance, and -$252M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QSML and PRFZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QSML vs PRFZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QSML PRFZ | -5.04%-5.10% | +2.67%-0.49% | +14.35%+15.96% | +14.45%+15.43% | n/a+62.08% | n/a+57.43% |
| Flows | QSML PRFZ | +$858K+$7M | +$858K-$35M | +$827K-$252M | +$2M-$506M | --$402M | --$229M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QSML PRFZ | +14.94%+13.49% | +16.75%+17.35% | n/a+20.26% | n/a+21.13% |
| Max drawdown | QSML PRFZ | -6.44%-6.88% | -10.76%-10.44% | n/a-26.51% | n/a-26.51% |
| Max drawdown duration | QSML PRFZ | 22d33d | 85d84d | n/a283d | n/a283d |
Trading data
QSML | PRFZ | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.90 | $53.00 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $33.17 | $53.26 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QSML | PRFZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QSML | PRFZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.90 | $53.00 |
| 1D performance | -0.80% | -0.49% |
| AuM | $12.34 M | $2.72 B |
| E/R | 0.38% | 0.36% |
Characteristics
QSML | PRFZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | WisdomTree | Invesco |
| Benchmark | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth SmallCap Index | RAFI Fundamental Select US 1500 Index |
| N° of holdings | 375 | 1499 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 25, 2024 | September 20, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Exposure
Countries
QSML
USA
96.46%
Other
3.54%
PRFZ
USA
97.66%
Other
2.34%
Sectors
QSML
Finance
19.91%
Technology
16.58%
Healthcare
13.44%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
11.11%
Industrials
10.06%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.68%
Other
20.22%
PRFZ
Finance
23.63%
Healthcare
17.84%
Technology
16.07%
Industrials
10.34%
Other
32.12%
Diversification
QSML
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
9.03%
PRFZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.25%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
QSML
TG Therapeutics, Inc.
0.73%
Essent Group Ltd.
0.64%
MarketAxess Holdings, Inc.
0.62%
Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.
0.61%
Installed Building Products, Inc.
0.61%
Enova International, Inc.
0.60%
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
0.60%
Lyft, Inc.
0.59%
ACI Worldwide, Inc.
0.59%
Genpact Ltd.
0.58%
Acushnet Holdings Corp.
0.58%
EPAM Systems, Inc.
0.58%
Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc.
0.57%
Mercury General Corp.
0.57%
Ligand Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
0.56%
PRFZ
Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.
0.44%
Roivant Sciences Ltd.
0.40%
ATI, Inc.
0.40%
Revolution Medicines, Inc.
0.39%
Iridium Communications, Inc.
0.36%
SharkNinja, Inc.
0.34%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.34%
Enova International, Inc.
0.34%
Bio-Techne Corp.
0.34%
Crescent Energy Co.
0.32%
10X Genomics, Inc.
0.32%
TTM Technologies, Inc.
0.31%
The GEO Group, Inc.
0.31%
UMB Financial Corp.
0.30%
Compass, Inc. (New York)
0.30%
Frequently asked questions about QSML and PRFZ
How have the QSML and PRFZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 18, 2026, QSML is up 14.35% year-to-date (YTD), while PRFZ has returned 15.96%. That puts PRFZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QSML or PRFZ?
Year-to-date, the QSML ETF saw +$827K in flows, compared to -$252M for PRFZ.
Which ETF is more volatile: QSML or PRFZ?
Over the past year, QSML had a volatility of 16.75%, while PRFZ experienced 17.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: QSML or PRFZ?
As of September 18, 2026, QSML holds $12.34 M in assets under management (AUM), while PRFZ manages $2.72 B.
What sectors do the QSML and PRFZ ETFs invest in?
QSML leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, PRFZ focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the QSML ETF and PRFZ ETF?
QSML top holdings include TG Therapeutics, Inc., Essent Group Ltd. and MarketAxess Holdings, Inc.. PRFZ holds in its top three: Par Pacific Holdings, Inc., Roivant Sciences Ltd. and ATI, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QSML or PRFZ?
QSML holds 375 securities with 9.03% of its assets in the top 15. PRFZ has 1500 securities and a top 15 weight of 5.25%.
Advertisement
