Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QRMIvsQYLGETF Comparison
Global X Nasdaq 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. QRMI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.35% for QYLG. QRMI is up 0.09% year-to-date (YTD) with +$798K in YTD flows. QYLG performs better with 0.55% YTD performance, and +$8M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QRMI and QYLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QRMI vs QYLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QRMI QYLG | -0.43%-0.20% | +1.00%+0.40% | +0.09%+0.55% | +5.85%+24.86% | +27.83%+83.06% | n/a+68.35% |
| Flows | QRMI QYLG | --$264K | +$798K+$20M | +$798K+$8M | -$873K+$38M | +$10M+$62M | -+$137M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QRMI QYLG | +6.03%+12.72% | +7.16%+19.25% | +7.10%+15.92% | n/a+18.60% |
| Max drawdown | QRMI QYLG | -2.03%-4.33% | -5.52%-13.82% | -8.42%-20.90% | n/a-30.00% |
| Max drawdown duration | QRMI QYLG | 55d42d | 188d45d | 279d155d | n/a718d |
QRMI | QYLG | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $15.57 | $26.68 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $15.68 | $27.06 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QRMI | QYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QRMI | QYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $15.57 | $26.68 |
| 1D performance | -0.70% | -1.40% |
| AuM | $16.48 M | $137.61 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.35% |
QRMI | QYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 Monthly Net Credit Collar 95-100 Index | CBOE Nasdaq-100 Half BuyWrite V2 Index |
| N° of holdings | 93 | 93 |
| Asset class | Equities | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 25, 2021 | December 11, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QRMI and QYLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, QRMI is up 0.09% year-to-date (YTD), while QYLG has returned 0.55%. That puts QYLG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QRMI or QYLG?
Year-to-date, the QRMI ETF saw +$798K in flows, compared to +$8M for QYLG.
Which ETF is more volatile: QRMI or QYLG?
Over the past year, QRMI had a volatility of 7.16%, while QYLG experienced 19.25%.
Which ETF is bigger: QRMI or QYLG?
As of March 11, 2026, QRMI holds $16.48 M in assets under management (AUM), while QYLG manages $137.61 M.
What sectors do the QRMI and QYLG ETFs invest in?
QRMI leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, QYLG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QRMI ETF and QYLG ETF?
QRMI top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. QYLG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: QRMI or QYLG?
QRMI holds 99 securities with 59.74% of its assets in the top 15. QYLG has 99 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.14%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
