QRMIvsQBETF Comparison
Global X Nasdaq 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF (QB) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. QRMI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.58% for QB. QRMI is up 2.48% year-to-date (YTD) with +$339K in YTD flows. QB performs better with 8.9% YTD performance, and +$926K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QRMI and QB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QRMI vs QB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QRMI QB | +1.19%-0.33% | +3.18%+6.65% | +2.48%+8.90% | +9.08%n/a | +22.23%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | QRMI QB | -$460K+$926K | -$459K+$926K | +$339K+$926K | -$3M- | +$8M- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QRMI QB | +7.54%+9.48% | +6.46%n/a | +7.25%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | QRMI QB | -4.05%-3.60% | -5.02%n/a | -8.42%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QRMI QB | 37d15d | 110dn/a | 279dn/a | n/an/a |
QRMI | QB | |
Last sale 6/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $15.59 | $45.97 |
| Previous close 06/11/2026 | $15.52 | $45.79 |
| Consolidated volume 06/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QRMI | QB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QRMI | QB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $15.59 | $45.97 |
| 1D performance | +0.43% | +0.38% |
| AuM | $15.91 M | $2.30 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.58% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
