Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QQWZvsMFVLETF Comparison
Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. QQWZ's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Energy and Information Technology. In contrast, MFVL's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. QQWZ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.5% for MFVL. QQWZ is up 4.08% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4M in YTD flows. MFVL performs worse with -0.18% YTD performance, and +$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QQWZ and MFVL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QQWZ vs MFVL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QQWZ MFVL | -1.38%-1.88% | +4.30%-0.68% | +4.08%-0.18% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | QQWZ MFVL | +$3M+$2M | +$19M+$6M | +$4M+$4M | -- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QQWZ MFVL | +12.17%+11.40% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | QQWZ MFVL | -3.54%-3.86% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QQWZ MFVL | 11d11d | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
QQWZ | MFVL | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.19 | $20.20 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $26.28 | $20.26 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QQWZ | MFVL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QQWZ | MFVL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.19 | $20.20 |
| 1D performance | -0.32% | -0.32% |
| AuM | $28.89 M | $6.48 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.5% |
QQWZ | MFVL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Motley Fool Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | Motley Fool Value Index |
| N° of holdings | 98 | 106 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 7, 2025 | December 8, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QQWZ and MFVL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, QQWZ is up 4.08% year-to-date (YTD), while MFVL has lost -0.18%. That puts QQWZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QQWZ or MFVL?
Year-to-date, the QQWZ ETF saw +$4M in flows, compared to +$4M for MFVL.
Which ETF is bigger: QQWZ or MFVL?
As of March 12, 2026, QQWZ holds $28.89 M in assets under management (AUM), while MFVL manages $6.48 M.
What sectors do the QQWZ and MFVL ETFs invest in?
QQWZ leans toward sectors like Health Care, Energy and Information Technology. Meanwhile, MFVL focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the QQWZ ETF and MFVL ETF?
QQWZ top holdings include NEWMONT CORP, EXXON and GILEAD SCIENCES. MFVL holds in its top three: CHEVRON TEXACO, FEDEX and WALMART INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: QQWZ or MFVL?
QQWZ holds 100 securities with 31.64% of its assets in the top 15. MFVL has 110 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.94%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
