QQQJvsPOWAETF Comparison
VS
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. QQQJ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.4% for POWA. QQQJ is up 22.13% year-to-date (YTD) with +$200M in YTD flows. POWA performs worse with 0.39% YTD performance, and -$14M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QQQJ and POWA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QQQJ vs POWA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QQQJ POWA | +0.68%-1.39% | -1.62%+2.75% | +22.13%+0.39% | +30.92%+2.09% | +74.28%+35.32% | +33.32%+36.72% |
| Flows | QQQJ POWA | +$39M-$2M | +$76M-$6M | +$200M-$14M | +$298M-$15M | +$73M-$94M | -$114M-$166M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QQQJ POWA | +18.47%+11.48% | +19.48%+12.06% | +19.00%+12.96% | +22.34%+14.02% |
| Max drawdown | QQQJ POWA | -6.34%-4.10% | -11.83%-9.77% | -22.53%-14.85% | -39.45%-17.75% |
| Max drawdown duration | QQQJ POWA | 62d22d | 78d218d | 152d208d | 1383d709d |
Trading data
QQQJ | POWA | |
Last sale 9/3/2026 at 3:24 PM | $45.14 | $90.23 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $44.89 | $90.24 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QQQJ | POWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/3/2026 at 3:24 PM
Live
Closed
QQQJ | POWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.14 | $90.23 |
| 1D performance | +0.56% | -0.01% |
| AuM | $1.18 B | $175.09 M |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.4% |
Characteristics
QQQJ | POWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Invesco |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index | Bloomberg Pricing Power Total Return Index |
| N° of holdings | 100 | 50 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 13, 2020 | December 15, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QQQJ
USA
84.1%
Other
15.9%
POWA
USA
90.33%
Other
9.67%
Sectors
QQQJ
Technology
26.9%
Healthcare
24.19%
Industrials
15.04%
Consumer Services
9.81%
Other
24.06%
POWA
Technology
23.24%
Healthcare
19.38%
Industrials
15.8%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
15.38%
Consumer Cyclical.
12.23%
Other
13.97%
Advertisement
Diversification
QQQJ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.78%
POWA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.76%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
QQQJ
eBay, Inc.
2.63%
United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
1.99%
Revolution Medicines, Inc.
1.97%
Flex Ltd.
1.94%
Kimberly-Clark Corp.
1.93%
Steel Dynamics, Inc.
1.87%
Natera, Inc.
1.86%
Elbit Systems Ltd.
1.83%
Expedia Group, Inc.
1.79%
NetApp, Inc.
1.75%
Medline, Inc.
1.74%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd.
1.68%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
1.64%
ON Semiconductor Corp.
1.58%
Biogen, Inc.
1.58%
POWA
Best Buy Co., Inc.
2.82%
Mettler-Toledo International, Inc.
2.44%
Roper Technologies, Inc.
2.41%
US Foods Holding Corp.
2.40%
Hormel Foods Corp.
2.37%
Garmin Ltd.
2.36%
Cencora, Inc.
2.29%
The Cooper Cos., Inc.
2.25%
HEICO Corp.
2.24%
McKesson Corp.
2.24%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
2.23%
Brown-Forman Corp.
2.19%
Cardinal Health, Inc.
2.19%
GoDaddy, Inc.
2.17%
Sysco Corp.
2.15%
Frequently asked questions about QQQJ and POWA
How have the QQQJ and POWA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, QQQJ is up 22.13% year-to-date (YTD), while POWA has returned 0.39%. That puts QQQJ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QQQJ or POWA?
Year-to-date, the QQQJ ETF saw +$200M in flows, compared to -$14M for POWA.
Which ETF is more volatile: QQQJ or POWA?
Over the past year, QQQJ had a volatility of 19.48%, while POWA experienced 12.06%.
Which ETF is bigger: QQQJ or POWA?
As of September 2, 2026, QQQJ holds $1.18 B in assets under management (AUM), while POWA manages $175.09 M.
What sectors do the QQQJ and POWA ETFs invest in?
QQQJ leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. Meanwhile, POWA focuses on Technology, Healthcare and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the QQQJ ETF and POWA ETF?
QQQJ top holdings include eBay, Inc., United Airlines Holdings, Inc. and Revolution Medicines, Inc.. POWA holds in its top three: Best Buy Co., Inc., Mettler-Toledo International, Inc. and Roper Technologies, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QQQJ or POWA?
QQQJ holds 105 securities with 27.78% of its assets in the top 15. POWA has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.76%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
