Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QQHvsTUGETF Comparison
STF Tactical Growth ETF
HCM Defender 100 ETF (QQH) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) is part of the segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. QQH is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.98%, versus 0.65% for TUG. QQH is down -2.91% year-to-date (YTD) with +$16M in YTD flows. TUG performs better with -1.63% YTD performance, and -$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QQH and TUG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QQH vs TUG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QQH TUG | -1.75%-0.90% | -5.14%-3.35% | -2.91%-1.63% | +25.63%+27.41% | +106.88%+85.82% | +87.82%n/a |
| Flows | QQH TUG | --$3M | +$39M-$5M | +$16M-$5M | +$24M-$190M | +$133M-$182M | +$297M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QQH TUG | +21.79%+16.35% | +22.80%+22.07% | +21.91%+18.70% | +22.12%n/a |
| Max drawdown | QQH TUG | -7.92%-6.25% | -13.04%-15.16% | -24.86%-22.02% | -41.41%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QQH TUG | 40d41d | 49d45d | 238d124d | 878dn/a |
QQH | TUG | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $75.08 | $39.03 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $75.04 | $38.99 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QQH | TUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QQH | TUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $75.08 | $39.03 |
| 1D performance | +0.06% | +0.10% |
| AuM | $675.72 M | $31.23 M |
| E/R | 0.98% | 0.65% |
QQH | TUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Howard Capital Management | STF Management |
| Benchmark | HCM Defender 100 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 84 | 92 |
| Asset class | Alternative | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 10, 2019 | May 18, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QQH and TUG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, QQH is down -2.91% year-to-date (YTD), while TUG has lost -1.63%. That puts TUG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QQH or TUG?
Year-to-date, the QQH ETF saw +$16M in flows, compared to -$5M for TUG.
Which ETF is more volatile: QQH or TUG?
Over the past year, QQH had a volatility of 22.8%, while TUG experienced 22.07%.
Which ETF is bigger: QQH or TUG?
As of March 9, 2026, QQH holds $675.72 M in assets under management (AUM), while TUG manages $31.23 M.
What sectors do the QQH and TUG ETFs invest in?
QQH leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, TUG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QQH ETF and TUG ETF?
QQH top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. TUG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: QQH or TUG?
QQH holds 88 securities with 58.27% of its assets in the top 15. TUG has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.05%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
