Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QQHvsQQQHETF Comparison
HCM Defender 100 ETF (QQH) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF - USD (QQQH) is part of the Options Strategies segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. QQH is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.98%, versus 0.68% for QQQH. QQH is down -2.9% year-to-date (YTD) with +$16M in YTD flows. QQQH performs better with -0.1% YTD performance, and +$7M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QQH and QQQH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QQH vs QQQH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QQH QQQH | -0.96%-0.33% | -5.48%-0.96% | -2.90%-0.10% | +25.65%+18.50% | +110.01%+81.35% | +88.64%+46.24% |
| Flows | QQH QQQH | -- | +$39M+$10M | +$16M+$7M | +$24M+$31M | +$133M-$221M | +$297M+$256M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QQH QQQH | +21.77%+10.25% | +22.75%+14.20% | +21.89%+13.31% | +22.11%+14.16% |
| Max drawdown | QQH QQQH | -7.92%-3.29% | -13.04%-10.80% | -24.86%-15.06% | -41.41%-31.09% |
| Max drawdown duration | QQH QQQH | 41d42d | 49d45d | 238d124d | 878d905d |
QQH | QQQH | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $73.41 | $52.81 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $75.08 | $53.40 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QQH | QQQH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QQH | QQQH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $73.41 | $52.81 |
| 1D performance | -2.23% | -1.11% |
| AuM | $675.81 M | $353.12 M |
| E/R | 0.98% | 0.68% |
QQH | QQQH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Howard Capital Management | Nationwide |
| Benchmark | HCM Defender 100 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 84 | 93 |
| Asset class | Alternative | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 10, 2019 | December 11, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QQH and QQQH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, QQH is down -2.9% year-to-date (YTD), while QQQH has lost -0.1%. That puts QQQH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QQH or QQQH?
Year-to-date, the QQH ETF saw +$16M in flows, compared to +$7M for QQQH.
Which ETF is more volatile: QQH or QQQH?
Over the past year, QQH had a volatility of 22.75%, while QQQH experienced 14.2%.
Which ETF is bigger: QQH or QQQH?
As of March 10, 2026, QQH holds $675.81 M in assets under management (AUM), while QQQH manages $353.12 M.
What sectors do the QQH and QQQH ETFs invest in?
QQH leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, QQQH focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QQH ETF and QQQH ETF?
QQH top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. QQQH holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: QQH or QQQH?
QQH holds 88 securities with 58.27% of its assets in the top 15. QQQH has 101 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.57%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
