Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QOWZvsSAWGETF Comparison
Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) and AAM Sawgrass US Large Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWG) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. QOWZ's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, SAWG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services. QOWZ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.49% for SAWG. QOWZ is down -6.89% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. SAWG performs better with -2.56% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QOWZ and SAWG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QOWZ vs SAWG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QOWZ SAWG | -2.05%-1.32% | -9.50%-3.31% | -6.89%-2.56% | +6.97%+14.77% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | QOWZ SAWG | -- | -$9K+$1K | -- | -$3M+$4K | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QOWZ SAWG | +15.68%+12.36% | +21.20%+17.27% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | QOWZ SAWG | -10.05%-4.84% | -13.59%-12.77% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QOWZ SAWG | 90d43d | 45d45d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
QOWZ | SAWG | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.99 | $21.24 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $33.33 | $21.62 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QOWZ | SAWG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QOWZ | SAWG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.99 | $21.24 |
| 1D performance | -1.02% | -1.76% |
| AuM | $13.33 M | $2.16 M |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.49% |
QOWZ | SAWG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | Advisors Asset Management |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq US Free Cash Flow Achievers Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 50 | 43 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 5, 2023 | July 31, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QOWZ and SAWG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, QOWZ is down -6.89% year-to-date (YTD), while SAWG has lost -2.56%. That puts SAWG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QOWZ or SAWG?
Year-to-date, the QOWZ ETF saw - in flows, compared to - for SAWG.
Which ETF is more volatile: QOWZ or SAWG?
Over the past year, QOWZ had a volatility of 21.2%, while SAWG experienced 17.27%.
Which ETF is bigger: QOWZ or SAWG?
As of March 11, 2026, QOWZ holds $13.33 M in assets under management (AUM), while SAWG manages $2.16 M.
What sectors do the QOWZ and SAWG ETFs invest in?
QOWZ leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, SAWG focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the QOWZ ETF and SAWG ETF?
QOWZ top holdings include NVIDIA, META PLATFORMS and BROADCOM LIMITED. SAWG holds in its top three: MICROSOFT-T, NVIDIA and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: QOWZ or SAWG?
QOWZ holds 50 securities with 57.33% of its assets in the top 15. SAWG has 43 securities and a top 15 weight of 57.06%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
