Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QOWZvsABOTETF Comparison
Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF (ABOT) is part of the US Large Cap segment. QOWZ's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, ABOT's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services. QOWZ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.59% for ABOT. QOWZ is down -6.89% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. ABOT performs worse with -11.29% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QOWZ and ABOT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QOWZ vs ABOT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QOWZ ABOT | -2.05%-0.21% | -9.50%-14.16% | -6.89%-11.29% | +6.97%+2.26% | n/a+57.27% | n/a+42.86% |
| Flows | QOWZ ABOT | -- | -$9K- | -- | -$3M-$3M | --$62M | --$84M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QOWZ ABOT | +15.68%+19.93% | +21.20%+21.51% | n/a+17.99% | n/a+19.58% |
| Max drawdown | QOWZ ABOT | -10.05%-17.54% | -13.59%-18.72% | n/a-22.58% | n/a-29.64% |
| Max drawdown duration | QOWZ ABOT | 90d90d | 45d135d | n/a134d | n/a801d |
QOWZ | ABOT | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.99 | $34.66 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $33.33 | $34.89 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QOWZ | ABOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QOWZ | ABOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.99 | $34.66 |
| 1D performance | -1.02% | -0.67% |
| AuM | $13.33 M | $4.33 M |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.59% |
QOWZ | ABOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Abacus FCF Advisors |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq US Free Cash Flow Achievers Index | Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders Index |
| N° of holdings | 50 | 48 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 5, 2023 | December 8, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QOWZ and ABOT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, QOWZ is down -6.89% year-to-date (YTD), while ABOT has lost -11.29%. That puts QOWZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QOWZ or ABOT?
Year-to-date, the QOWZ ETF saw - in flows, compared to - for ABOT.
Which ETF is more volatile: QOWZ or ABOT?
Over the past year, QOWZ had a volatility of 21.2%, while ABOT experienced 21.51%.
Which ETF is bigger: QOWZ or ABOT?
As of March 11, 2026, QOWZ holds $13.33 M in assets under management (AUM), while ABOT manages $4.33 M.
What sectors do the QOWZ and ABOT ETFs invest in?
QOWZ leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, ABOT focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the QOWZ ETF and ABOT ETF?
QOWZ top holdings include NVIDIA, META PLATFORMS and BROADCOM LIMITED. ABOT holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: QOWZ or ABOT?
QOWZ holds 50 securities with 57.33% of its assets in the top 15. ABOT has 49 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.03%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
