Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QMOMvsPFUTETF Comparison
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) and Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. QMOM's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Materials and Information Technology. In contrast, PFUT's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. QMOM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.65% for PFUT. QMOM is up 6.95% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. PFUT performs worse with -4.39% YTD performance, and -$386M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QMOM and PFUT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QMOM vs PFUT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QMOM PFUT | -1.42%-3.10% | +3.70%-7.85% | +6.95%-4.39% | +24.83%+9.13% | +65.41%+42.01% | +32.73%n/a |
| Flows | QMOM PFUT | +$856K-$396M | +$6M-$380M | +$5M-$386M | +$18M-$329M | +$149M-$222M | +$182M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QMOM PFUT | +25.56%+16.94% | +24.70%+22.10% | +21.74%+18.49% | +24.64%n/a |
| Max drawdown | QMOM PFUT | -8.04%-9.19% | -14.73%-16.31% | -26.41%-27.52% | -26.41%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QMOM PFUT | 9d90d | 50d45d | 414d462d | 414dn/a |
QMOM | PFUT | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 2:55 PM | $68.01 | $24.22 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $69.79 | $24.32 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
QMOM | PFUT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $68.01 | $24.22 |
| 1D performance | -2.55% | -0.40% |
| AuM | $369.92 M | $4.84 M |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.65% |
QMOM | PFUT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Alpha Architect | Putnam |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 47 | 62 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 2, 2015 | May 25, 2021 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QMOM and PFUT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, QMOM is up 6.95% year-to-date (YTD), while PFUT has lost -4.39%. That puts QMOM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QMOM or PFUT?
Year-to-date, the QMOM ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to -$386M for PFUT.
Which ETF is more volatile: QMOM or PFUT?
Over the past year, QMOM had a volatility of 24.7%, while PFUT experienced 22.1%.
Which ETF is bigger: QMOM or PFUT?
As of March 11, 2026, QMOM holds $369.92 M in assets under management (AUM), while PFUT manages $4.84 M.
What sectors do the QMOM and PFUT ETFs invest in?
QMOM leans toward sectors like Industrials, Materials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, PFUT focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the QMOM ETF and PFUT ETF?
QMOM top holdings include ENERGY FUELS, COEUR MINING INC and GB00BRXH2664. PFUT holds in its top three: VERTIV HOLDINGS, HILTON INC and PENUMBRA.
Which ETF is more diversified: QMOM or PFUT?
QMOM holds 50 securities with 30.45% of its assets in the top 15. PFUT has 64 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.36%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
